Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 231

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of inoculation of plant-growth promoting bacteria on Ni uptake by Indian mustard

Rajkumar, Mani, Freitas, Helena·2008·Bioresource Technology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.046

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Abdul Baki, 1973, Vigour determination in soya bean seed by multiple criteria, Crop Sci., 13, 630, 10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001300060013x · DOI · Paper page
  2. Altschul, 1997, Gapped BLAST and PSIBLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs, Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 3389, 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bano, 2003, Isolation and characterization of phorate degrading soil bacteria of environmental and agronomic significance, Lett. Appl. Micribiol., 36, 349, 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01329.x · doi:10.1046/j.1472-765x.2003.01329.x
  4. Belimov, 2005, Cadmium-tolerant plant growth-promoting bacteria associated with the roots of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.Czern.), Soil Biol. Biochem., 37, 241, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.033 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Blaylock, 1997, Enhanced accumulation of Pb in Indian mustard by soil-applied chelating agents, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 860, 10.1021/es960552a · DOI · Paper page
  6. Branco, 2005, Impact of chromium-contaminated wastewaters on the microbial community of a river, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 54, 35, 10.1016/j.femsec.2005.02.014 · DOI
  7. Bric, 1991, Rapid in situ assay for indole acetic acid production by bacteria immobilization on a nitrocellulose membrane, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 57, 535, 10.1128/AEM.57.2.535-538.1991 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Burd, 2000, Plant growth promoting bacteria that decreases heavy metal toxicity in plants, Can. J. Microbiol., 46, 237, 10.1139/w99-143 · doi:10.1139/w99-143 · Paper page
  9. Dell’Amico, 2005, Analysis of rhizobacterial communities in perennial Graminaceae from polluted water meadow soil, and screening of metal-resistant, potentially plant growth-promoting bacteria, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 52, 153, 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.11.005 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Dunbar, 1999, Levels of bacterial community diversity in four arid soils compared by cultivation and 16S rRNA gene cloning, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65, 1662, 10.1128/AEM.65.4.1662-1669.1999 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Evers, 1989, Metal ion recognition in ligands with negatively charged oxygen donor groups. Complexation of Fe(III), Ga(III), In(III), Al(III) and other highly charged metal ions, Inorg. Chem., 28, 2189, 10.1021/ic00310a035 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Dworkin, 1958, Experiments with some microorganisms which utilize ethane and hydrogen, J. Bacteriol., 75, 592, 10.1128/JB.75.5.592-603.1958 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Fiske, 1925, A colorimetric determination of phosphorus, J. Biol. Chem., 66, 375, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)84756-1 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Freitas, 2004, Analysis of serpentinophytes from north-east of Portugal for trace metal accumulation-relevance to the management of mine environment, Chemosphere, 54, 1625, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.09.045 · DOI
  15. Garcia de Salamone, 2001, Cytokinin production by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and selected mutants, Can. J. Microbiol., 47, 103, 10.1139/w01-029 · doi:10.1139/w01-029 · Paper page
  16. Gupta, 2002, Development of heavy metal resistant mutants of phosphate solubilizing Pseudomonas sp. NBRI4014 and their characterization, Curr. Microbiol., 45, 323, 10.1007/s00284-002-3762-1 · doi:10.1007/s00284-002-3762-1
  17. Guo, 1995, Uptake, distribution, and binding of cadmium and nickel in different plant species, J. Plant Nutr., 18, 2691, 10.1080/01904169509365094 · DOI
  18. Hall, 1996, Root elongation in various agronomic crops by the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12-2, Israel J. Plant Sci., 44, 37, 10.1080/07929978.1996.10676631 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Halstead, 1969, Extractibility of nickel added to soils and its concentration in plants, Can. J. Soil Sci., 49, 335, 10.4141/cjss69-046 · doi:10.4141/cjss69-046
  20. Hu, 1996, Siderophore-mediated aluminum uptake by Bacillus megaterium ATCC 19213, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 62, 4044, 10.1128/AEM.62.11.4044-4048.1996 · DOI
  21. ISTA, 1966, International rules for seed testing, Proc. Int. Seed Test Assoc., 31, 1
  22. Karenlampi, 2000, Genetic engineering in the improvement of plants for phytoremediation of metal polluted soils, Environ. Pollut., 107, 225, 10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00141-4 · DOI · Paper page
  23. McGrath, 2003, Phytoextraction of metals and metalloids from contaminated soils, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 14, 277, 10.1016/S0958-1669(03)00060-0 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Mengoni, 2001, Characterization of nickel-resistant bacteria isolated from serpentine soil, Environ. Microbiol., 3, 691, 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2001.00243.x · DOI
  25. Mishra, 1974, Nickel in plant growth and metabolism, Bot. Rev., 40, 395, 10.1007/BF02860020 · doi:10.1007/bf02860020
  26. Pal, 2005, Occurrence of heavy metal-resistance in microflora from serpentine soil of Andaman, J. Basic Microbiol., 45, 207, 10.1002/jobm.200410499 · DOI
  27. Panwar, 2002, Phytoremediation of Nickel-contaminated soils by Brasssica species, Environ. Dev. Sustain., 4, 1, 10.1023/A:1016337132370 · DOI
  28. Patten, 1996, Bacterial biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid, Can. J. Microbiol., 42, 207, 10.1139/m96-032 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Puschenreiter, 2001, Phytoextraction of heavy metal contaminated soils with Thlaspi goesingense and Amaranthus hybridus: rhizosphere manipulation using EDTA and ammonium sulfate, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 164, 615, 10.1002/1522-2624(200112)164:6<615::AID-JPLN615>3.0.CO;2-6 · doi:10.1002/1522-2624(200112)164:6<615::aid-jpln615>3.0.co;2-6
  30. Rajkumar, 2005, Characterization of a novel Cr6+ reducing Pseudomonas sp. with plant growth-promoting potential, Curr. Microbiol., 50, 266, 10.1007/s00284-005-4470-4 · DOI
  31. Robinson, 2000, Natural and induced cadmium accumulation in poplar and willow: implications for phytoremediation, Plant Soil, 227, 301, 10.1023/A:1026515007319 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Romkens, 2002, Potentials and drawbacks of chelate-enhanced phytoremediation of soils, Environ. Pollut., 116, 109, 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00150-6 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Salt, 1995, Phytoremediation: a novel strategy for the removal of toxic metals from the environment using plants, Biotechnology, 13, 468
  34. Schwyn, 1987, Universal chemical assay for detection and determination of siderophores, Anal. Biochem., 160, 47, 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90612-9 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Sundara-Rao, 1963, Phosphate dissolving microorganisms in the soil and rhizosphere, Indian J. Agric. Sci., 33, 272
  36. Wu, 2006, Effects of inoculation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on metal uptake by Brassica juncea, Environ. Pollut., 140, 124, 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.06.023 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 231

Metadata

Authors
Rajkumar, M., & Freitas, H.
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
99
Issue
9
Pages
3491-3498
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967922548
Cited by
231
References
2
FWCI
8.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of inoculation of plant-growth promoting bacteria on Ni uptake by Indian mustard. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.046
The paper
Rajkumar, M., & Freitas, H. (2008). Effects of inoculation of plant-growth promoting bacteria on Ni uptake by Indian mustard. Bioresource Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.046

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.