The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of hemicellulose removal on cellulose fiber structure and recycling characteristics of eucalyptus pulp
Open accessAbstract
Eucalyptus pulp fibers with large differences in cellulose and hemicellulose proportions but similar lignin contents were produced by partial removal of the hemicellulose and studied using Cross-Polarization Magic Angle Spinning Carbon-13 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (CP/MAS (13)C NMR) in combination with spectral fitting, Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). There were remarkable differences in both cellulose fibril structure, pore structure and cellulose supermolecular structure between the samples. CP/MAS (13)C NMR combined with spectral fitting demonstrated an increase in average fibril aggregate size (17.9-22.2 nm) with decreasing hemicellulose content. AFM observations revealed that when the hemicellulose content decreased from 27.62% to 19.80%, the average diameters of pores decreased by 12.53%, but increased by 13.55% when the hemicellulose content decreased from 19.80% to 9.09%. XRD and FTIR analysis indicated that cellulose crystallinity increased with decreasing hemicellulose content. The low and high hemicellulose-containing pulps had very different recycling characteristics, which may be explained by the changes observed at cellulose fiber structure level. Fibrils appear to aggregate and form a more compact structure when the hemicellulose is removed, which was caused by a coalescence of the cellulose microfibrils. The removal of hemicellulose had disadvantageous influence on the accessibility of fibers and enhanced fiber flattening during drying, leading to increased sheet density and increased hornification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Karimah, A., Ridho, M. R., Munawar, S. S., Adi, D. S., Ismadi, Damayanti, R., Subiyanto, B., Fatriasari, W., & Fudholi, A. (2021) · Journal of Materials Research and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.06.014 · Cited by 771
Cheng, G., Varanasi, P., Li, C., Liu, H., Melnichenko, Y. B., Simmons, B. A., Kent, M. S., & Singh, S. (2011) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm101240z · Cited by 437
da Silva, A. S., Espinheira, R. P., Teixeira, R. S. S., de Souza, M. F., Ferreira-Leitão, V., & Bon, E. P. S. (2020) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-020-01697-w · Cited by 322
Jagadeesh, P., Puttegowda, M., Mavinkere Rangappa, S., & Siengchin, S. (2021) · Polymer Composites · doi:10.1002/pc.26312 · Cited by 281
Paukkonen, H., Kunnari, M., Laurén, P., Hakkarainen, T., Auvinen, V.-V., Oksanen, T., Koivuniemi, R., Yliperttula, M., & Laaksonen, T. (2017) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.09.002 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Wan, J., Wang, Y., & Xiao, Q.
- Venue
- Bioresource Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4577-4583
- ISSN
- 0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053273979
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of hemicellulose removal on cellulose fiber structure and recycling characteristics of eucalyptus pulp. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.026
- The paper
- Wan, J., Wang, Y., & Xiao, Q. (2010). Effects of hemicellulose removal on cellulose fiber structure and recycling characteristics of eucalyptus pulp. Bioresource Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.