Cited by 138Composting and Vermicomposting TechniquesSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsWaste Management and Recycling

Evaluation of three composting systems for the management of spent coffee grounds

Liu, K., Price, G.W.·2011·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the optimum composting approach for the management of spent coffee grounds from the restaurant and ready-to-serve coffee industry. Three composting systems were assessed, including in-vessel composting, vermicomposting bins, and aerated static pile bin composting, over study periods ranging from 47 to 98 days. Total carbon content was reduced by 5-7% in the spent coffee ground treatments across the three composting systems. Nitrogen and other mineral nutrient contents were conserved or enhanced from the initial to the final composts in all the composting systems assessed. Earthworm growth and survival (15-80%) was reduced in all the treatments but mortality rates were lower in coffee treatments with cardboard additions. A decline in earthworm mortality with cardboard additions was the result of reduced exposure to organic compounds and chemicals released through the decomposition of spent coffee grounds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.073

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Composting SCG (including vermicomposting) reduces SCG inhibitory effects on other plants, including lettuce, attributed to limitation of microbial activity, chelating of caffeine and other toxins, neutralizing pH, and reduction in C:N ratios.

    “Previous studies have shown that composting SCG (including vermicomposting) similarly reduced SCG inhibitory effects on other plants, including lettuce.This has been attributed to the limitation of microbial activity, the chelating of caffeine and other toxins, neutralizing pH, and a reduction in C:N ratios [27,28,31,55,56].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, K., & Price, G. W.
Corresponding author
Price, G.W.
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
102
Issue
17
Pages
7966-7974
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033504458
Cited by
138
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
Keywords
spent coffee grounds, composting systems, in-vessel composting, vermicomposting, earthworm mortality, nitrogen retention, carbon emission reduction, restaurant waste, coffee industry waste, organic waste management
MeSH terms
Animals, Carbon, Coffee, Electric Conductivity, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Nitrogen, Oligochaeta, Soil, Temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review