Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 53Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionMicrobial Fuel Cells and BioremediationBiofuel production and bioconversion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anaerobic co-digestion of excess brewery yeast in a granular biomass reactor to enhance the production of biomethane

Zupančič, Gregor D., Škrjanec, Igor, Marinšek Logar, Romana·2012·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

The anaerobic co-digestion of brewery yeast using granular biomass was studied on the lab, pilot and full-scale. The study shows no adverse effects in the co-digestion of yeast and wastewater in concentrations up to 1.1 (v/v)%. In concentrations up to 2.3% the process is manageable; however, not advisable. In concentrations over 2.8% the process exhibits failure due to the overload with suspended solids. An average specific biogas production of 0.560 m(3)kg(-1) of volatile solids was achieved. Full-scale operation with 0.7% yeast concentration showed a 38.5% increase in the biogas production and a 26.2% increase in the organic loading rate, which resulted in an increase of the biomethane/natural-gas substitute ratio from 10% to 16%. The influence of the yeast addition on the structure of the microbial biomass showed up to 7% dissimilarity in the archaeal and a 32% dissimilarity in the bacterial biomass community, which did not present any difficulties.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.064

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kormelinck, 2003, Optimum wastewater treatment at Paulaner Munich, Brauwelt International, 6, 387
  2. Zupančič G.D., Klemenčič M., Stražiščar M., 2009. Improving the energy balance in brewing industry using waste yeast as an energy substrate, in: Olabi A.G. (Eds.), Sustainable energy beyond 2020. in: proceedings of the 3rd International conference on sustainable energy & environmental protection: Part 2. Dublin City University, Ireland, pp 64–69.

Cited by

See all 53

Metadata

Authors
Zupančič, G. D., Škrjanec, I., & Marinšek Logar, R.
Affiliations
University of Ljubljana (SI)
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
124
Pages
328-337
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985956722
Cited by
53
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
co-digestion, brewing yeast, biomethane production, biogas yield, organic loading rate, microbial community structure, archaea, bacteria, wastewater treatment, full-scale operation
MeSH terms
Anaerobiosis, Methane, Pilot Projects, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Biomass, Bioreactors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.