CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 50Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionBiofuel production and bioconversionComposting and Vermicomposting Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Feasibility of anaerobic co-digestion of poultry blood with maize residues

Cuetos, M.J., Gómez, X., Martínez, E.J., Fierro, J., Otero, M.·2013·Bioresource Technology
DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.129
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The potential of anaerobic digestion for the treatment of poultry blood was evaluated in batch assays at laboratory scale and in a mesophilic semi-continuously fed digester. The biodegradability test performed on poultry blood waste showed a strong inhibition. Maize residues were used as co-substrate to overcome inhibition thanks to nitrogen dilution. Under batch operation, increasing the maize concentration from 15% to 70% (volatile solids (VS) basis) provided an increase of biogas from 130±31 to 188±21 L CH4/kg VS. In the semi-continuous mesophilic anaerobic digester, the biogas yield was 165±17 L CH4/kg VS fed, as a result of strong volatile fatty acid (VFA) accumulation. Although physical modifications of maize particles were observed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), an incomplete degradation was confirmed from analysis of digestates. Furthermore, Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analysis demonstrated that along with VFA build-up, an accumulation of non-degraded materials took place.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.129

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cuetos et al. found that poultry blood could not be degraded under mono-digestion, but adding maize as co-substrate from 15 to 70% (VS proportion) yielded methane yields from 192.7 to 311.4 mLCH4/g VS, whereas maize BMP test value was 157.1 mLCH4/g VS.

    “This organic stream could not be degraded under mono-digestion conditions, but the addition of maize as a co-substrate from 15 to 70% (percentage indicating VS proportion of maize in the final mixture) reported methane yields from 192.7 to 311.4 mLCH 4 /g VS with the increase of maize addition, whereas the value obtained from maize BMP test was 157.1 mLCH 4 /g VS.”

    From Biogas Production from Organic Wastes: Integrating Concepts of Circular Economy (2021) · cites this paper as Cuetos et al. [99]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Alvarez, 2008, Semi-continuous co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste, manure and fruit and vegetable waste, Renew. Energ., 33, 726, 10.1016/j.renene.2007.05.001 · DOI
  2. Amon, 2007, Methane production through anaerobic digestion of various energy crops grown in sustainable crop rotations, Bioresour. Technol., 98, 3204, 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.007 · DOI
  3. Amon, 2007, Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure-Influence of biomass composition on the methane yield, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 118, 173, 10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.007 · DOI
  4. Angelidaki, 1993, Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of livestock waste: the effect of ammonia, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 38, 560, 10.1007/BF00242955 · DOI
  5. Cuetos, 2009, Anaerobic co-digestion of poultry blood with OFMSW: FTIR and TG-DTG study of process stabilization, Environ. Technol., 30, 571, 10.1080/09593330902835730 · DOI
  6. Cuetos, 2011, Anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure with energy crop residues, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 16, 1044, 10.1007/s12257-011-0117-4 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Damartzis, 2011, Thermal degradation studies and kinetic modeling of cardoon (Cynara cardunculus) pyrolysis using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Bioresour. Technol., 102, 6230, 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.060 · DOI
  8. Demirel, 2009, Laboratory investigations on continuous bio-methanization of energy crops as mono-substrate without supplementation, Biomass Bioenergy, 33, 988, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.03.005 · DOI
  9. Hejnfelt, 2009, Anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse by-products, Biomass Bioenergy, 33, 1046, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.03.004 · DOI
  10. Karlsson, 2012, Addition of HCl as a means to improve biogas production from protein-rich food industry waste, Biochem. Eng. J., 61, 43, 10.1016/j.bej.2011.12.003 · DOI
  11. Klocke, 2007, Microbial community analysis of a biogas-producing completely stirred tank reactor fed continuously with fodder beet silage as mono-substrate, Syst. Appl. Microbiol., 30, 139, 10.1016/j.syapm.2006.03.007 · DOI
  12. Lehtomäki, 2007, Laboratory investigations on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production: effect of crop to manure ratio, Resour. Conserv. Recy., 51, 591, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.11.004 · DOI
  13. Lobato, 2010, Improvement of biogas production by co-digestion of swine manure and residual glycerine, Biofuels, 1, 59, 10.4155/bfs.09.2 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Marcos, 2010, Combustible gas production (methane) and biodegradation of solid and liquid mixtures of meat industry wastes, Appl. Energy, 87, 1729, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.09.037 · DOI
  15. Meissl, 2007, Prediction of humic acid content and respiration activity of biogenic waste by means of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra and partial least squares regression (PLS-R) models, Talanta, 72, 791, 10.1016/j.talanta.2006.12.005 · DOI
  16. Nges, 2012, Benefits of supplementing an industrial waste anaerobic digester with energy crops for increased biogas production, Waste Manage., 32, 53, 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.09.009 · DOI
  17. Nopharatana, 2006, Kinetics and dynamic-modelling of batch anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste in a stirred reactor, Waste Manage., 27, 595, 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.04.010 · DOI
  18. Otero, 2008, Non-isothermal thermogravimetric analysis of the combustion of two different carbonaceous materials: coal and sewage sludge, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 93, 619, 10.1007/s10973-007-8415-y · DOI
  19. Otero, 2011, Digestion of cattle manure: thermogravimetric kinetic analysis for the evaluation of organic matter conversion, Bioresour. Technol., 102, 3404, 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.016 · DOI
  20. Palmowski, 2000, Influence of size reduction of organic waste on their anaerobic digestion, Water Sci. Technol., 41, 155, 10.2166/wst.2000.0067 · DOI
  21. Peu, 2012, Prediction of hydrogen sulphide production during anaerobic digestion of organic substrates, Bioresour. Technol., 121, 419, 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.112 · DOI
  22. Raposo, 2006, Influence of inoculum to substrate ratio on the biochemical methane potential of maize in batch tests, Process Biochem., 41, 1444, 10.1016/j.procbio.2006.01.012 · DOI
  23. Resch, 2011, Enhancement options for the utilisation of nitrogen rich animal by-products in anaerobic digestion, Bioresour. Technol., 102, 2503, 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.044 · DOI
  24. Salminen, 2000, Anaerobic batch degradation of solid poultry slaughterhouse waste, Water Sci. Technol., 4, 33, 10.2166/wst.2000.0053 · DOI
  25. Salminen, 2001, Characterisation and anaerobic batch degradation of materials accumulating in anaerobic digesters treating poultry slaughterhouse waste, Environ. Technol., 22, 577, 10.1080/09593332208618261 · DOI
  26. Sonobe, 2008, Kinetic analyses of biomass pyrolysis using the distributed activation energy model, Fuel, 87, 414, 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.05.004 · DOI
  27. Sørum, 2001, Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of municipal solid wastes, Fuel, 80, 1217, 10.1016/S0016-2361(00)00218-0 · DOI
  28. Tintner, 2012, Risk assessment of an old landfill regarding the potential of gaseous emissions – A case study based on bioindication, FT-IR spectroscopy and thermal analysis, Waste Manage., 32, 2418, 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.022 · DOI
  29. Van Soest, 1991, Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition, J. Dairy Sci., 74, 3583, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Wang, 2003, Evaluation of a two stage anaerobic digester for the treatment of mixed abattoir wastes, Process Biochem., 38, 1267, 10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00324-2 · DOI
  31. Zhang, 2012, Co-digestion of the mechanically recovered organic fraction of municipal solid waste with slaughterhouse wastes, Biochem. Eng. J., 68, 129, 10.1016/j.bej.2012.07.017 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cuetos, M. J., Gómez, X., Martínez, E. J., Fierro, J., & Otero, M.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de León (ES)
  • Centro de Estudos do Ambiente e do Mar (PT)
Corresponding author
Gómez, X.
ORCID
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
144
Pages
513-520
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.129
OpenAlex
W2053393173
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (RYC-2010-05634)
  • European Regional Development Fund
  • Ministry of Education
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
Keywords
co-digestion, poultry blood, maize residue, biogas yield, nitrogen dilution, volatile fatty acid accumulation, mesophilic digestion, digestate
MeSH terms
Anaerobiosis, Animals, Biodegradation, Environmental, Blood, Zea mays, Fatty Acids, Volatile, Feasibility Studies, Poultry, Temperature, Thermogravimetry, Volatilization, Waste Products, Plant Leaves, Environmental Restoration and Remediation, Biofuels, Batch Cell Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review