Upgrading dilute ethanol from syngas fermentation to n-caproate with reactor microbiomes
Abstract
Fermentation of syngas from renewable biomass, which is part of the syngas platform, is gaining momentum. Here, the objective was to evaluate a proof-of-concept bioprocessing system with diluted ethanol and acetic acid in actual syngas fermentation effluent as the substrate for chain elongation into the product n-caproic acid, which can be separated with less energy input than ethanol. Chain elongation is performed with open cultures of microbial populations (reactor microbiomes) as part of the carboxylate platform. The highest concentration of n-caproic acid of ~1 g L(-1) was produced at a pH of 5.44 and a production rate of 1.7 g L(-1) day(-1). A higher n-butyrate production rate of 20 g L(-1) day(-1) indicated that product toxicity was limiting the chain elongation step from n-butyric acid to n-caproic acid. This result shows that the syngas and carboxylate platforms can be integrated within a biorefinery, but that product separation is necessary.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A dilute ethanol and acetate product stream from syngas fermentation with C. ljungdahlii was used as the substrate for a separate anaerobic reactor, which produced butyrate and caproate.
“A dilute ethanol and acetate product stream from syngas fermentation with C. ljungdahlii was used as the substrate for a separate anaerobic reactor, which produced butyrate and caproate (Vasudevan et al., 2014).”
From Gas Fermentation—A Flexible Platform for Commercial Scale Production of Low-Carbon-Fuels and Chemicals from Waste and Renewable Feedstocks (2016) · cites this paper as Vasudevan et al., 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 174
- Authors
- Vasudevan, D., Richter, H., & Angenent, L. T.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Angenent, Largus T.
- Venue
- Bioresource Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 151
- Pages
- 378-382
- ISSN
- 0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973860529
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 13.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eCommons (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Army Research Office
- Army Research Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Keywords
- syngas fermentation, hexanoic acid, chain extension, acetic acid, n-butyric acid, product toxicity, carboxylate platform, biorefinery, bioprocessing
- MeSH terms
- Ethanol, Caproates, Carboxylic Acids, Fermentation, Gases, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Methane, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Bioreactors, Microbiota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review