Cited by 153Algal biology and biofuel productionLight effects on plantsAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spirulina cultivated under different light emitting diodes: Enhanced cell growth and phycocyanin production

Open access

Abstract

This study evaluated light emitting diodes (LEDs) as a light source in Spirulina sp. LEB 18 cultures in terms of growth parameters and biomass composition. Different photoperiods (partial and integral) and colors (blue, green, red and white) were assessed. Blue, green, red and white LEDs increased biomass productivity and maximum specific growth rate of such cultivations. The maximum biomass concentration (1.77 ± 0.02 g L-1) was obtained when red LEDs in integral light photoperiod were applied to cultivations. The biomass composition showed around 12.8% carbohydrates (w w-1), 57.4% proteins (w w-1) and 12.7% lipids (w w-1). The major fatty acids produced during cultivations were palmitic, linoleic and γ-linolenic. Green LEDs in partial light photoperiod promoted a higher concentration of phycocyanin (126.39 mg g biomass-1). The potential of LEDs as an energy source in Spirulina sp. LEB 18 cultures was demonstrated by the biomass and bioproducts photostimulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.122

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 40 references

3 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Thajuddin, 2005, Cyanobacterial biodiversity and potential applications in biotechnology, Curr. Sci. India, 89, 47

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–153 of 153

Metadata

Authors
Prates, D. D. F., Radmann, E. M., Duarte, J. H., Morais, M. G. D., & Costa, J. A. V.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (BR)
Corresponding author
Costa, Jorge Alberto Vieira
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
256
Pages
38-43
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790470672
Cited by
153
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • CAPES
  • CNPq
  • MCTIC
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
Spirulina, light-emitting diodes, photoperiod, LED color, phycocyanin production, microalgae cultivation, biomass productivity, specific growth rate, fatty acid composition, gamma-linolenic acid, photostimulation, blue light, green light, red light
MeSH terms
Light, Photosynthesis, Phycocyanin, Biomass, Spirulina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review