Cited by 78Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalWater Treatment and DisinfectionCoagulation and Flocculation Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adsorption removal of natural organic matters in waters using biochar

Lee, Duu-Jong, Cheng, Ya-Ling, Wong, Ruei-Jyun, Wang, Xiao-Dong·2018·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

This work concerns the adsorption of aromatic organic matter from river water using various doses of a simulated biochar. The water yielded five UV 254 peaks associated with organic matters in size exclusion chromatography (SEC), corresponding to molecular weights (MW) of 10,000, 6500, 4800, 3000, and 1500 Da. Biochar removes all of these peaks with an overall adsorption of 6.4 mg-DOC/g-C, and preferentially removes organic matter with high MW. Physisorption control in a pseudo-second-order type model fits the adsorption kinetics. Biochar can therefore be used as an efficient adsorbent of organic matter in water.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.016

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Cheng, 2010, Water coagulation using electrostatic patch coagulation (EPC) mechanisms, Dry Technol., 28, 850, 10.1080/07373937.2010.490492 · DOI
  2. Cheng, 2010, Pre-treatment of natural organic matters containing raw water during coagulation, Separ. Sci. Technol., 45, 911, 10.1080/01496391003666890 · DOI
  3. Jiang, 2017, Adsorption of estrogen contaminants by graphene nanomaterials under natural organic matter preloading: comparison to carbon nanotube, biochar, and activated carbon, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 6352, 10.1021/acs.est.7b00073 · DOI
  4. Jung, 2015, Removal of humic and tannic acids by adsorption-coagulation combined systems with activated biochar, J. Hazard. Mater., 300, 808, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.08.025 · DOI
  5. Ivancev-Tumbas, 2014, The fate and importance of organics in drinking water treatment: a review, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 21, 11794, 10.1007/s11356-014-2894-8 · DOI
  6. Korotta-Gamage, 2017, A review: potential and challenges of biologically activated carbon to remove natural organic matter in drinking water purification process, Chemosphere, 167, 120, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.097 · DOI
  7. Lee, 2013, Characteristics of natural organic matters in raw and treated drinking water: comparison study, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 44, 103, 10.1016/j.jtice.2012.10.001 · DOI
  8. Levchuk, 2018, Removal of natural organic matter (NOM) from water by ion exchange – a review, Chemosphere, 192, 90, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.101 · DOI
  9. Menya, 2018, Production and performance of activated carbon from rice husks for removal of natural organic matter from water: a review, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 129, 271, 10.1016/j.cherd.2017.11.008 · DOI
  10. Oliverira, 2017, Environmental application of biochar: current status and perspectives, Bioresour. Technol., 246, 110, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.122 · DOI
  11. Shankar, 2017, Evaluation of biochar-ultrafiltration membrane processes for humic acid removal under various hydrodynamic, pH, ionic strength, and pressure conditions, J. Environ. Manage., 197, 610, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.040 · DOI
  12. Shimabuku, 2017, Simplified modeling of organic contaminant adsorption by activated carbon and biochar in the presence of dissolved organic matter and other competing adsorbates, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 10031, 10.1021/acs.est.7b00758 · DOI
  13. Sillanpaa, 2018, Advanced oxidation processes for the removal of natural organic matter from drinking water sources: a comprehensive review, J. Environ. Manage., 208, 56, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.009 · DOI
  14. Sizmur, 2017, Biochar modification to enhance sorption of inorganics from water, Bioresour. Technol., 246, 34, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.082 · DOI
  15. Tan, 2017, Biochar as potential sustainable precursors for activated carbon production: multiple applications in environmental protection and energy storage, Bioresour. Technol., 227, 359, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.083 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 78

Metadata

Authors
Lee, D.-J., Cheng, Y.-L., Wong, R.-J., & Wang, X.-D.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
Corresponding author
Lee, Duu-Jong
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
260
Pages
413-416
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2796199248
Cited by
78
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists (51525602)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
Keywords
biochar, adsorption, natural organic matter, river water, dissolved organic carbon, molecular weight distribution, physisorption, pseudo-second-order kinetics, UV254, water treatment
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Charcoal, Kinetics, Molecular Weight, Water Pollutants, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review