Cited by 78Composting and Vermicomposting TechniquesHeavy metals in environmentAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal

A novel method for removing heavy metals from composting system: The combination of functional bacteria and adsorbent materials

Yang, Kangjie, Zhu, Longji, Zhao, Yue, Wei, Zimin, Chen, Xiaomeng, Yao, Changhao, Meng, Qingqing, Zhao, Ran·2019·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

The aim of this study was to remove heavy metals from composting system using a novel method combined functional bacteria with adsorbent materials. Four types of adsorbent materials were selected in this study. Results showed that Cr had significant removal efficiency, especially in sponge treatment (19.09%) and cotton treatment (26.36%). In addition, a significant movement of heavy metals from the outside to adsorbent column was also observed. RDA results indicated that bands 1, 2, 10, 18, 19 and 20 had negative correlations with six types of heavy metals, which contributed to the removal of heavy metals. Structural equation models further confirmed functional bacteria can directly affect the removal of Cu, Cd and Cr. In addition, it can also indirectly remove Pb and Cr by changing native bacteria. In summary, this study suggested the combination of functional bacteria and adsorbent materials was effective to remove heavy metals from composting system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122095

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microbial treatments transform biomass through humification and stabilization; aerobic composting and anaerobic fermentation can be used; additives such as fly ash, red mud, biochar, and lime reduce heavy-metal leaching; combined metal-tolerant bacteria and humus can minimize metal leaching by more than 60%; functional bacteria consortium reduced Cr leaching by 19.1-26.4%.

    “The microbial treatments lead to enzymatic reactions (transformations) of biomass through humification and stabilization of organic matter.”

    From Sustainable management of post-phytoremediation biomass (2025) · cites this paper as Yang et al. 2019a

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, K., Zhu, L., Zhao, Y., Wei, Z., Chen, X., Yao, C., Meng, Q., & Zhao, R.
Affiliations
Northeast Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wei, Zimin
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
293
Pages
122095
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971280491
Cited by
78
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10
FWCI
9.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778116, 51878132, 51978131)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Keywords
heavy metal removal, composting, functional bacteria, adsorbents, chromium, copper, cadmium, lead, sponges, cotton, indigenous bacteria, heavy metal adsorption
MeSH terms
Composting, Bacteria, Metals, Heavy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review