Process optimization for the production of high-concentration ethanol with Scenedesmus raciborskii biomass
Abstract
Scenedesmus raciborskii WZKMT was subjected to fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation to facilitate the saccharification of high-solid-loading substrate for high-concentration ethanol. In this work, process factors affecting enzymatic hydrolysis, including enzyme loading, temperature, pH, and solid loading, were optimized. Results showed that 58.03 g L-1 glucose, 12.57 g L-1 xylose, and 1.45 g L-1 cellobiose were obtained after the enzymatic hydrolysis of 330 g L-1 substrates under the optimal conditions of 30 FPU g-1 enzyme loading, 50 °C, and pH 5.5. Meanwhile, 89.60% yield and 30.43 g L-1 content of ethanol were obtained after the fermentation of 330 g L-1 hydrolysate. The maximum ethanol concentration of 79.38 g L-1 could be achieved through repeated fed-batch process, indicating that S. raciborskii WZKMT is a promising feedstock for ethanol production.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reports show the feasibility of producing bioethanol from algal biomass, particularly lipid-extracted biomass, which can be converted into simple sugars through saccharification and fermented to produce ethanol.
“Despite corn and sugarcane being the main sources of bioethanol, reports show the feasibility of producing it from algal biomass, particularly lipid-extracted biomass, which can be converted into simple sugars through saccharification and fermented to produce ethanol [77–79].”
From A Holistic Approach to Circular Bioeconomy Through the Sustainable Utilization of Microalgal Biomass for Biofuel and Other Value-Added Products (2024) · cites this paper as [77]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- Alam, M. A., Yuan, T., Xiong, W., Zhang, B., Lv, Y., & Xu, J.
- Affiliations
- Zhengzhou University (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Xu, Jingliang
- Venue
- Bioresource Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 294
- Pages
- 122219
- ISSN
- 0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2977862503
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repository of Guangzhou Institute of Energy Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Project (2018YFB1501701)
- Guangdong Science and Technology Research Program (2017A010105018)
- Key Project of International Cooperation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (182344KYSB20160056)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Keywords
- enzymatic hydrolysis, fed-batch fermentation, microalgal biomass, saccharification, high solid loading, glucose, xylose, cellobiose, ethanol yield
- MeSH terms
- Ethanol, Fermentation, Hydrolysis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Biomass, Scenedesmus, Biofuels
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review