Wastewater-borne microalga Chlamydomonas sp.: A robust chassis for efficient biomass and biomethane production applying low-N cultivation strategy
Abstract
Biogas/biomethane generation from microalgae biomass via anaerobic fermentation is increasingly gaining attention as CO 2-neutral energy source. Intensive research has shown, however, that microalgae represent a rather challenging substrate for anaerobic digestion (AD) due to their high cell wall recalcitrance and unfavourable protein content. Previously, the utilization of nitrogen-limited (low-N) microalgal biomass for continuous AD-processes was demonstrated (as proof-of-concept) with remarkable biomethane productivity. The present study shows the efficient portability of the low-N cultivation/fermentation strategy on a robust, wastewater-borne microalga isolate that tolerates high temperature and light conditions and can perfectly cope with microbial contaminations. Continuous long-term anaerobic digestion was characterized by stable and efficient specific biogas and biomethane productivity (765 ± 20 and 478 ± 15 mL N g-1 volatile solids (VS) d-1, respectively), equivalent to volumetric methane productivity of 1912 mL N L-1 d-1. The present work underlines the applicability of low-N-biomass of wastewater-borne, robust microalgae as mono-substrate for highly efficient continuous methane generation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cell wall degradability plays an important role, with easily degradable species lacking a cell wall (e.g., Dunaliella salina) or a protein-based cell wall lacking hemicellulose or cellulose (e.g., Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Euglena gracilis) having a higher BMP than species containing these components, e.g., Parachlorella kessleri and Scenedesmus obliquus.
“As with macroalgae, cell wall degradability plays an important role with easily degradable species lacking a cell wall (e.g., Dunaliella salina ) or a proteinbased cell wall lacking hemicellulose or cellulose (e.g., Chlamydomonas reinhardtii ), Euglena gracilis ) having a higher BMP than species containing these components, e.g., Parachlorella kessleri and Scenedesmus obliquus [89].”
From Key Targets for Improving Algal Biofuel Production (2021) · cites this paper as [89]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Klassen, V., Blifernez-Klassen, O., Bax, J., & Kruse, O.
- Affiliations
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- Venue
- Bioresource Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 315
- Pages
- 123825
- ISSN
- 0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3043789802
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/R017050/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
- Keywords
- Chlamydomonas, anaerobic digestion, biomethane production, biogas, microalgal biomass, continuous anaerobic digestion, heat tolerance, light tolerance, microbial contamination, methane productivity, cell wall recalcitrance
- MeSH terms
- Anaerobiosis, Chlamydomonas, Methane, Biomass, Biofuels, Microalgae, Wastewater
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review