The DOI matches its Crossref record; 128 of the 128 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anaerobic co-digestion: Current status and perspectives
Open accessAbstract
Anaerobic digestion is a long-established technology for the valorization of diverse organic wastes with concomitant generation of valuable resources. However, mono-digestion (i.e., anaerobic digestion using one feedstock) suffers from challenges associated with feedstock characteristics. Co-digestion using multiple feedstocks provides the potential to overcome these limitations. Significant research and development efforts have highlighted several inherent merits of co-digestion, including enhanced digestibility due to synergistic effects of co-substrates, better process stability, and higher nutrient value of the produced co-digestate. However, studies focused on the underlying effects of diverse co-feedstocks on digester performance and stability have not been synthesized so far. This review fills this gap by highlighting the limitations of mono-digestion and critically examining the benefits of co-digestion. Furthermore, this review discusses synergistic effect of co-substrates, characterization of microbial communities, the prediction of biogas production via different kinetic models, and highlights future research directions for the development of a sustainable biorefinery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review
Chen, Y., Cheng, J. J., & Creamer, K. S. (2008) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057 · Cited by 4,830
A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013
Mata-Alvarez, J., Dosta, J., Romero-Güiza, M. S., Fonoll, X., Peces, M., & Astals, S. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.039 · Cited by 1,115
Anaerobic digestion of food waste – Challenges and opportunities
Xu, F., Li, Y., Ge, X., Yang, L., & Li, Y. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.020 · Cited by 1,000
Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: Progress, challenges and perspectives
Hagos, K., Zong, J., Li, D., Liu, C., & Lu, X. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.184 · Cited by 904
Radhakrishnan, A., Nanjappa, V., Raja, R., Sathe, G., Puttamallesh, V. N., Jain, A. P., Pinto, S. M., Balaji, S. A., Chavan, S., Sahasrabuddhe, N. A., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep46864 · Cited by 825
Cultivation of Pleurotus ostreatus and other edible mushrooms
Sánchez, C. (2010) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-009-2343-7 · Cited by 630
Yao, Y., Gao, B., Inyang, M., Zimmerman, A. R., Cao, X., Pullammanappallil, P., & Yang, L. (2011) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.006 · Cited by 608
Toxicants inhibiting anaerobic digestion: A review
Chen, J. L., Ortiz, R., Steele, T. W. J., & Stuckey, D. C. (2014) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.10.005 · Cited by 586
The anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and cattle manure
Zhang, C., Xiao, G., Peng, L., Su, H., & Tan, T. (2013) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.138 · Cited by 575
Neshat, S. A., Mohammadi, M., Najafpour, G. D., & Lahijani, P. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.137 · Cited by 515
Cited by
Biomass Energy and Biofuels: Perspective, Potentials, and Challenges in the Energy Transition
Mignogna, D., Szabó, M., Ceci, P., & Avino, P. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16167036 · Cited by 248
Farghali, M., Mohamed, I. M. A., Osman, A. I., & Rooney, D. W. (2023) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-022-01520-y · Cited by 225
Bioenergy production from chicken manure: a review
Tawfik, A., Eraky, M., Osman, A. I., Ai, P., Zhou, Z., Meng, F., & Rooney, D. W. (2023) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-023-01618-x · Cited by 93
Aravani, V. P., Tsigkou, K., Papadakis, V. G., & Kornaros, M. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133985 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Karki, R., Chuenchart, W., Surendra, K. C., Shrestha, S., Raskin, L., Sung, S., Hashimoto, A., & Kumar Khanal, S.
- Venue
- Bioresource Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 330
- Pages
- 125001
- ISSN
- 0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3136614321
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 128
- FWCI
- 33.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anaerobic co-digestion: Current status and perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125001
- The paper
- Karki, R., Chuenchart, W., Surendra, K. C., Shrestha, S., Raskin, L., Sung, S., Hashimoto, A., & Kumar Khanal, S. (2021). Anaerobic co-digestion: Current status and perspectives. Bioresource Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
