Cited by 26Evolution and Genetic DynamicsProtist diversity and phylogenyMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Construction of bacteria–eukaryote synthetic mutualism

Open access
Kubo, Isao, Hosoda, Kazufumi, Suzuki, Shingo, Yamamoto, Kayo, Kihara, Kumiko, Mori, Kotaro, Yomo, Tetsuya·2013·Biosystems

Abstract

Mutualism is ubiquitous in nature but is known to be intrinsically vulnerable with regard to both population dynamics and evolution. Synthetic ecology has indicated that it is feasible for organisms to establish novel mutualism merely through encountering each other by showing that it is feasible to construct synthetic mutualism between organisms. However, bacteria-eukaryote mutualism, which is ecologically important, has not yet been constructed. In this study, we synthetically constructed mutualism between a bacterium and a eukaryote by using two model organisms. We mixed a bacterium, Escherichia coli (a genetically engineered glutamine auxotroph), and an amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum, in 14 sets of conditions in which each species could not grow in monoculture but potentially could grow in coculture. Under a single condition in which the bacterium and amoeba mutually compensated for the lack of required nutrients (lipoic acid and glutamine, respectively), both species grew continuously through several subcultures, essentially establishing mutualism. Our results shed light on the establishment of bacteria-eukaryote mutualism and indicate that a bacterium and eukaryote pair in nature also has a non-negligible possibility of establishing novel mutualism if the organisms are potentially mutualistic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biosystems.2013.05.006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 26

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hass, J.R., Weir, M.D., Thomas, G.B., 2007. University Calculus. Pearson Higher Ed USA, Cranbury, NJ.

Authors
Kubo, I., Hosoda, K., Suzuki, S., Yamamoto, K., Kihara, K., Mori, K., & Yomo, T.
Affiliations
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
Corresponding author
Yomo, Tetsuya
Venue
Biosystems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
113
Issue
2
Pages
66-71
ISSN
0303-2647 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000140670
Cited by
26
References
52
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biosystems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23770021)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
Escherichia coli, Dictyostelium discoideum, alpha-lipoic acid, nutrient exchange, co-culture, synthetic ecology
MeSH terms
Dictyostelium, Escherichia coli, Population Dynamics, Symbiosis, Synthetic Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review