Construction of bacteria–eukaryote synthetic mutualism
Open accessAbstract
Mutualism is ubiquitous in nature but is known to be intrinsically vulnerable with regard to both population dynamics and evolution. Synthetic ecology has indicated that it is feasible for organisms to establish novel mutualism merely through encountering each other by showing that it is feasible to construct synthetic mutualism between organisms. However, bacteria-eukaryote mutualism, which is ecologically important, has not yet been constructed. In this study, we synthetically constructed mutualism between a bacterium and a eukaryote by using two model organisms. We mixed a bacterium, Escherichia coli (a genetically engineered glutamine auxotroph), and an amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum, in 14 sets of conditions in which each species could not grow in monoculture but potentially could grow in coculture. Under a single condition in which the bacterium and amoeba mutually compensated for the lack of required nutrients (lipoic acid and glutamine, respectively), both species grew continuously through several subcultures, essentially establishing mutualism. Our results shed light on the establishment of bacteria-eukaryote mutualism and indicate that a bacterium and eukaryote pair in nature also has a non-negligible possibility of establishing novel mutualism if the organisms are potentially mutualistic.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is possible to construct a synthetic mutualism using two species or strains that do not interact in nature.
“However, through the use of two species or strains that do not interact in nature, it is possible to construct a synthetic mutualism [25].”
From Toward the Enhancement of Microalgal Metabolite Production through Microalgae–Bacteria Consortia (2021) · cites this paper as [25]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 26
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Hass, J.R., Weir, M.D., Thomas, G.B., 2007. University Calculus. Pearson Higher Ed USA, Cranbury, NJ.
- Authors
- Kubo, I., Hosoda, K., Suzuki, S., Yamamoto, K., Kihara, K., Mori, K., & Yomo, T.
- Affiliations
- The University of Osaka (JP)
- Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Yomo, Tetsuya
- Venue
- Biosystems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 66-71
- ISSN
- 0303-2647 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000140670
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biosystems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
- Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23770021)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Keywords
- Escherichia coli, Dictyostelium discoideum, alpha-lipoic acid, nutrient exchange, co-culture, synthetic ecology
- MeSH terms
- Dictyostelium, Escherichia coli, Population Dynamics, Symbiosis, Synthetic Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review