The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant disease identification from individual lesions and spots using deep learning
Abstract
Deep learning is quickly becoming the standard technique for image classification. The main problem facing the automatic identification of plant diseases using this strategy is the lack of image databases capable of representing the wide variety of conditions and symptom characteristics found in practice. Data augmentation techniques decrease the impact of this problem, but those cannot reproduce most of the practical diversity. This paper explores the use of individual lesions and spots for the task, rather than considering the entire leaf. Since each region has its own characteristics, the variability of the data is increased without the need for additional images. This also allows the identification of multiple diseases affecting the same leaf. On the other hand, suitable symptom segmentation still needs to be done manually, preventing full automation. The accuracies obtained using this approach were, in average, 12% higher than those achieved using the original images. Additionally, no crop had accuracies below 75%, even when as many as 10 diseases were considered. Although the database does not cover the entire range of practical possibilities, these results indicate that, as long as enough data is available, deep learning techniques are effective for plant disease detection and recognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., et al. (2016) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 · Cited by 18,423
Toward interoperable bioscience data
Sansone, S.-A., Rocca-Serra, P., Field, D., Maguire, E., Taylor, C., Hofmann, O., Fang, H., Neumann, S., Tong, W., Amaral-Zettler, L., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.1054 · Cited by 475
Cited by
Machine learning in agriculture domain: A state-of-art survey
Meshram, V., Patil, K., Meshram, V., Hanchate, D., & Ramkteke, S. D. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ailsci.2021.100010 · Cited by 367
Sharma, P., Berwal, Y. P. S., & Ghai, W. (2020) · Information Processing in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.inpa.2019.11.001 · Cited by 361
Santos, T. T., de Souza, L. L., dos Santos, A. A., & Avila, S. (2020) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105247 · Cited by 359
Fan, S., Li, J., Zhang, Y., Tian, X., Wang, Q., He, X., Zhang, C., & Huang, W. (2020) · Journal of Food Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110102 · Cited by 312
A comparative study of deep learning and internet of things for precision agriculture
Saranya, T., Deisy, C., Sridevi, S., & Anbananthen, K. S. M. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106034 · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Arnal Barbedo, J. G.
- Venue
- Biosystems Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 180
- Pages
- 96-107
- ISSN
- 1537-5110 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2911433502
- Cited by
- 783
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 51.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant disease identification from individual lesions and spots using deep learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.02.002
- The paper
- Arnal Barbedo, J. G. (2019). Plant disease identification from individual lesions and spots using deep learning. Biosystems Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.02.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.