Polymeric micelles in mucosal drug delivery: challenges towards clinical translation
Abstract
Polymeric micelles are nanostructures formed by the self-aggregation of copolymeric amphiphiles above the critical micellar concentration. Due to the flexibility to tailor different molecular features, they have been exploited to encapsulate motley poorly-water soluble therapeutic agents. Moreover, the possibility to combine different amphiphiles in one single aggregate and produce mixed micelles that capitalize on the features of the different components substantially expands the therapeutic potential of these nanocarriers. Despite their proven versatility, polymeric micelles remain elusive to the market and only a few products are currently undergoing advanced clinical trials or reached clinical application, all of them for the therapy of different types of cancer and administration by the intravenous route. At the same time, they emerge as a nanotechnology platform with great potential for non-parenteral mucosal administration. However, for this, the interaction of polymeric micelles with mucus needs to be strengthened. The present review describes the different attempts to develop mucoadhesive polymeric micelles and discusses the challenges faced in the near future for a successful bench-to-bedside translation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A wide array of water-insoluble therapeutics, encompassing proteins and gene-based medications, can be enveloped within the hydrophobic core of polymer nanomicelles with a substantial enhancement in solubility ranging from 10 to 5000 fold.
“A wide array of water-insoluble therapeutics, encompassing proteins and gene-based medications, can be enveloped within the hydrophobic core of polymer nanomicelles with a substantial enhancement in solubility ranging from 10 to 5000 fold.”
From From design to Deployment: The innovative role of nanomicelles in targeted ophthalmic therapeutics (2025) · cites this paper as [205]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 204 · Cited by 154
- Authors
- Sosnik, A., & Menaker Raskin, M.
- Affiliations
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Sosnik, Alejandro
- ORCID
- Sosnik, Alejandro
- Venue
- Biotechnology Advances
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1380-1392
- ISSN
- 0734-9750 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046320906
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 204
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 9
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biotechnology Advances (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Union's — Seventh Framework Programme (#612675-MC-NANOTAR)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
- Keywords
- polymeric micelles, mucosal drug delivery, mucoadhesion, mixed micelles, poorly water-soluble drugs, nanocarriers, clinical translation, cancer therapy
- MeSH terms
- Acrylic Resins, Micelles, Mucous Membrane, Polymers, Polymethacrylic Acids, Polysaccharides, Technology, Pharmaceutical, Drug Delivery Systems, Nanotechnology, Chitosan, Translational Research, Biomedical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review