CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 414

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in environmental technology

Pokorna, Dana, Zabranska, Jana·2015·Biotechnology Advances
DOI 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.02.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Hydrogen sulfide is widely known as the most undesirable component of biogas that caused not only serious sensoric and toxic problems, but also corrosion of concrete and steel structures. Many agricultural and industrial waste used in biogas production, may contain a large amount of substances that serve as direct precursors to the formation of sulfide sulfur-sources of hydrogen sulfide in the biogas. Biological desulfurization methods are currently promoted to abiotic methods because they are less expensive and do not produce undesirable materials which must be disposed of. The final products of oxidation of sulfides are no longer hazardous. Biological removal of sulfide from a liquid or gaseous phase is based on the activity of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria. They need an oxidizing agent such as an acceptor of electrons released during the oxidation of sulfides-atmospheric oxygen or oxidized forms of nitrogen. Different genera of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and their technological application are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.02.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 117

  1. Alcantara, 2004, Hydrogen sulfide oxidation by a microbial consortium in a recirculation reactor system: sulfur formation under oxygen limitation and removal of phenols, Environ Sci Technol, 38, 918, 10.1021/es034527y · DOI
  2. An, 2010, Simultaneous biodesulphurization and denitrification using an oil reservoir microbial culture: effects of sulphide loading rate and sulphide to nitrate loading ratio, Water Res, 44, 1531, 10.1016/j.watres.2009.10.037 · DOI
  3. Baker, 1998, Molecular genetics of the genus Paracoccus: metabolically versatile bacteria with bioenergetic flexibility, Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 62, 1046, 10.1128/MMBR.62.4.1046-1078.1998 · DOI
  4. Baspinar, 2011, Biogas desulphurization at technical scale by lithotrophic denitrification: integration of sulphide and nitrogen removal, Process Biochem, 46, 916, 10.1016/j.procbio.2011.01.001 · DOI
  5. Beristain-Cardoso, 2008, Simultaneous sulfide and acetate oxidation under denitrifying conditions using an inverse fluidized bed reactor, J Chem Technol, 83, 1197
  6. Brock, 1976, Ferric iron reduction by sulfur-and-iron-oxidizing bacteria, Appl Environ Microbiol, 32, 567, 10.1128/AEM.32.4.567-571.1976 · DOI
  7. Burgess, 2001, Developments in odour control and waste gas treatment biotechnology: a review, Biotechnol Adv, 19, 35, 10.1016/S0734-9750(00)00058-6 · DOI
  8. Can-Dogan, 2010, Sulfide removal from industrial wastewaters by lithotrophic denitrification using nitrate as an electron acceptor, Water Sci Technol, 2286–93
  9. Cardoso, 2006, Sulfide oxidation under chemolithoautotrophic denitrifying conditions, Biotechnol Bioeng, 95, 1148, 10.1002/bit.21084 · DOI
  10. Cattaneo, 2003, Denitrification performance of Pseudomonas putida in fluidized-bed biofilm reactor and in a stirred tank reactor, Eng Life Sci, 3, 579, 10.1002/elsc.200390026 · DOI
  11. Cha, 1999, Removal of organo-sulphur compounds by Thiobacillus novellus SRM, sulphur-oxidizing microorganisms, Process Biochem, 34, 659, 10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00139-3 · DOI
  12. Chen, 1972, Kinetics of oxidation of aqueous sulfide by O2, Environ Sci Technol, 6, 529, 10.1021/es60065a008 · DOI
  13. Chen, 2008, Biological breakdown of denitrifying sulfide removal process in high-rate expanded granular bed reactor, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 81, 765, 10.1007/s00253-008-1720-y · DOI
  14. Chen, 2008, Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review, Bioresour Technol, 99, 4044, 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057 · DOI
  15. Chen, 2010, Enhancing denitrifying sulfide removal with functional strains under micro-aerobic condition, Process Biochem, 45, 1007, 10.1016/j.procbio.2010.02.013 · DOI
  16. Cho, 2000, Biological deodorization of hydrogen sulfide using porous lava as a carrier of Thiobacillus thiooxidans, J Biosci Bioeng, 90, 25, 10.1016/S1389-1723(00)80029-8 · DOI
  17. Choi, 1991, Competition and inhibition of sulfate reducers and methane producers in anaerobic treatment, Water Sci Technol, 23, 1259, 10.2166/wst.1991.0577 · DOI
  18. Choudhary, 2012, Performance of single substrate in sulphate reducing bioreactor for the treatment of acid mine drainage, Miner Eng, 39, 29, 10.1016/j.mineng.2012.07.005 · DOI
  19. Chung, 1996, Operation optimalization of Thiobacillus thioparus CH11 biofilter for hydrogen sulfide removal, J Biotechnol, 52, 31, 10.1016/S0168-1656(96)01622-7 · DOI
  20. Cobley, 1983, Energy conservation in acidophilic bacteria, Microbiol Rev, 47, 579, 10.1128/MR.47.4.579-595.1983 · DOI
  21. Colleran, 2002, Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sulphate-containing wastewaters, Water Sci Technol, 45, 231, 10.2166/wst.2002.0339 · DOI
  22. Colleran, 1995, Anaerobic treatment of sulphate-containing waste streams, Anton Leeuw, 67, 29, 10.1007/BF00872194 · DOI
  23. Cork, 1985, Control of oxidative sulfur metabolism of Chlorobium limola forma thiosulfatophilum, Appl Environ Microbiol, 49, 269, 10.1128/AEM.49.2.269-272.1985 · DOI
  24. Dahl, 1989, Comparative enzymology of sulfite oxidation in Thiocapsa roseopersicina strains 6311, M1 and BBS under chemotrophic and phototrophic conditions, Z Naturforsch, 44, 617, 10.1515/znc-1989-7-812 · DOI
  25. De Smul, 1999, Retention of sulphate-reducing bacteria in expanded granular-sludge-blanket reactors, Water Environ Res, 71, 427, 10.2175/106143097X122077 · DOI
  26. Deng, 2006, Anaerobic digestion and post-treatment of swine wastewater using IC–SBR process with bypass of raw wastewater, Process Biochem, 41, 965, 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.10.022 · DOI
  27. Díaz, 2010, Performance evaluation of oxygen, air and nitrate for the microaerobic removal of hydrogen sulphide in biogas from sludge digestion, Bioresour Technol, 101, 7724, 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.062 · DOI
  28. Duan, 2005, Treatment oh H2S using a horizontal biotrickling filter based on biological activated carbon: reactor setup and performance evaluation, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 67, 143, 10.1007/s00253-004-1771-7 · DOI
  29. Estrada-Vázquez, 2003, The effect of the supplementation with a primary carbon source on the resistance to oxygen exposure of methanogenic sludge, Water Sci Technol, 48, 119, 10.2166/wst.2003.0374 · DOI
  30. Fang, 1997, Effect of sulfate on anaerobic degradation of benzoate in UASB reactors, J Environ Eng, 123, 320, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1997)123:4(320) · DOI
  31. Fdz-Polanco, 2009, Hydrogen sulfide removal in the anaerobic digestion of sludge by microaeration processes: pilot plant experience, Water Sci Technol, 60, 3045, 10.2166/wst.2009.738 · DOI
  32. Filho, 2010, Performance evaluation of packing materials in the removal of hydrogen sulphide in gas-phase biofilters: polyurethane foam, sugarcane bagasse, and coconut fibre, Chem Eng J, 158, 441, 10.1016/j.cej.2010.01.014 · DOI
  33. Fortuny, 2008, Biological sweetening of energy gases mimics in biotrickling filters, Chemosphere, 71, 10, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.10.072 · DOI
  34. Gadekar, 2006, Batch and continuous biooxidation of sulphide by Thiomicrospira sp. CVO: reaction kinetics and stoichiometry, Water Res, 40, 2436, 10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.007 · DOI
  35. Giro, 2006, Immobilized cells of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans in PVC strands and sulfite removal in a pilot-scale bioreactor, Biochem Eng J, 28, 201, 10.1016/j.bej.2005.11.005 · DOI
  36. Gommers, 1988, Simultaneous sulfide and acetate oxidation in a denitrifying fluidized bed reactor—I. Start-up and reactor performance, Water Res, 22, 1075, 10.1016/0043-1354(88)90001-2 · DOI
  37. González-Sánchez, 2007, The effect of chemical oxidation on the biological sulfide oxidation by an alkaliphilic sulfoxidizing bacterial consortium, Enzyme Microb Technol, 40, 292, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.04.017 · DOI
  38. Gupta, 1994, Methanogenesis and sulfate reduction in chemostats—I. Kinetic studies and experiments, Water Res, 28, 781, 10.1016/0043-1354(94)90085-X · DOI
  39. Henshaw, 2001, Biological conversion of hydrogen sulphide to elemental sulphur in a fixed-film continuous flow photo-reactor, Water Res, 35, 3605, 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00082-3 · DOI
  40. Hoeks, 1984, Anaerobic treatment of acid water (methane production in a sulfate rich environment), Prog Ind Microbiol, 127, 113
  41. Ito, 2007, Degradation of dimethyl disulfide by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain 76, Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 71, 366, 10.1271/bbb.60295 · DOI
  42. Janssen, 1998, Application of the redox potential for controlling a sulfide oxidizing bioreactor, Biotechnol Bioeng, 60, 147, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19981020)60:2<147::AID-BIT2>3.0.CO;2-N · DOI
  43. Janssen, 1999, Removal of hydrogen sulphide from wastewater and waste gases by biological conversion to elemental sulphur: colloidal and interfacial aspects of biologically produced sulphur particles, Colloids Surf A, 151, 389, 10.1016/S0927-7757(98)00507-X · DOI
  44. Janssen, 2009, Application of bacteria involved in the biological sulfur cycle for paper mill effluent purification, Sci Total Environ, 407, 1333, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.09.054 · DOI
  45. Jenicek, 2010, Advantages of anaerobic digestion of sludge in microaerobic conditions, Water Sci Technol, 62, 427, 10.2166/wst.2010.305 · DOI
  46. Jenicek, 2014, Improving products of anaerobic sludge digestion by microaeration, Water Sci Technol, 69, 803, 10.2166/wst.2013.779 · DOI
  47. Jiang, 2008, Reusing H2S-exhausted carbon as packing material for odor biofiltration, Chemosphere, 73, 698, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.07.004 · DOI
  48. Jing, 2008, Effect of sulfide to nitrate ratios on the simultaneous anaerobic sulfide and nitrate removal, Bioresour Technol, 99, 5520, 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.10.053 · DOI
  49. Jing, 2010, Influence of various nitrogenous electron acceptors on the anaerobic sulfide oxidation, Bioresour Technol, 101, 2931, 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.047 · DOI
  50. Kabdasli, 1995, Sulfate removal from indigo dyeing textile wastewater, Water Sci Technol, 32, 21, 10.2166/wst.1995.0451 · DOI
  51. Kalyuzhnyi, 1997, Biological sulfate reduction in a UASB reactor fed with ethanol as the electron donor, Microbiology, 66, 565
  52. Kampf, 1980, Capacity of chromatiaceae for chemotrophic growth. Specific respiration rates of Thiocystis violacea and Chromatium vinosum, Arch Microbiol, 127, 125, 10.1007/BF00428016 · DOI
  53. Kato, 1994, Feasibility of expanded granular sludge bed reactors for the anaerobic treatment of low-strength soluble wastewaters, Biotechnol Bioeng, 44, 469, 10.1002/bit.260440410 · DOI
  54. Kelly, 2000, Confirmation of Thiobacillus denitrificans as a species of the genus Thiobacillus, in the beta-subclass of the Proteobacteria, with strain NCIMB 9548 as the type strain, Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 50, 440, 10.1099/00207713-50-2-547 · DOI
  55. Kelly, 2000, Reclassification of some species of Thiobacillus to the newly designated genera Thiobacillus gen.nov., Halotriobacillus gen. nov. and Thermithiobacillus gen. nov, Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 50, 511, 10.1099/00207713-50-2-511 · DOI
  56. Kim, 1991, Application of light emitting diodes as a light source to photosynthetic culture of Chlorobium thiosulfatophilum, Biotechnol Tech, 5, 343, 10.1007/BF00185011 · DOI
  57. Kim, 1991, Removal of hydrogen sulfide by Chlorobium thiosulfatophilum in immobilized cell and sulfur settling free-cell recycle reactors, Biotechnol Prog, 7, 495, 10.1021/bp00012a003 · DOI
  58. Kleerebezem, 2002, Autotrophic denitrification for combined hydrogen sulfide removal from biogas and post-denitrification, Water Sci Technol, 45, 349, 10.2166/wst.2002.0368 · DOI
  59. Kleinjan, 2006, Foam formation in a biotechnological process for the removal of hydrogen sulfide from gas streams, Colloids Surf A, 275, 36, 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.09.015 · DOI
  60. Kniemeyer, 2003, Anaerobic degradation of ethylbenzene by a new type of marine sulfate-reducing bacterium, Appl Environ Microbiol, 69, 760, 10.1128/AEM.69.2.760-768.2003 · DOI
  61. Kobayashi, 1983, Use of photosynthetic bacteria for hydrogen sulfide removal from anaerobic waste treatment effluent, Water Res, 17, 579, 10.1016/0043-1354(83)90117-3 · DOI
  62. Kodama, 1970, Effects of growth conditions on formation of cytochrome system of a denitrifying bacterium, Pseudomonas stutzeri, Plant Cell Physiol, 11, 231, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a074504 · DOI
  63. Koe, 2000, A bioscrubber for hydrogen sulphide removal, Water Sci Technol, 41, 141, 10.2166/wst.2000.0103 · DOI
  64. Koenig, 2001, Kinetic model of autotrophic denitrification in sulphur packed-bed reactors, Water Res, 35, 1969, 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00483-8 · DOI
  65. Krischan, 2012, Design and scale-up of an oxidative scrubbing process for the selective removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas, J Hazard Mater, 215–216, 49, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.02.028 · DOI
  66. Krishnakumar, 1999, Bacterial oxidation of sulphide under denitrifying conditions, Biotechnol Lett, 21, 437, 10.1023/A:1005584920800 · DOI
  67. Krishnakumar, 2005, Treatment of sulphide containing wastewater with sulphur recovery in a novel reverse fluidized loop reactor (RFLR), Water Res, 39, 639, 10.1016/j.watres.2004.11.015 · DOI
  68. Lee, 2006, Removal of hydrogen sulfide by sulfate-resistant Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans AZ11, J Biosci Bioeng, 101, 309, 10.1263/jbb.101.309 · DOI
  69. Lens, 1998, Biotechnological treatment of sulfate-rich wastewaters, Environ Sci Technol, 28, 41, 10.1080/10643389891254160 · DOI
  70. Li, 2008, Comparative study of using different materials as bacterial carriers to treat hydrogen sulfide, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 81, 579, 10.1007/s00253-008-1745-2 · DOI
  71. Liu, 2009, Study of combined heterotrophic and sulphur autotrophic denitrification technology for removal of nitrate in water, J Hazard Mater, 169, 23, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.053 · DOI
  72. Lu, 1983, Partial purification and resolution of a thiosulphate-oxidizing system from Thiobacillus A2, J Gen Microbiol, 129, 1673
  73. Ma, 2006, Removal of H2S in waste gases by an activated carbon bioreactor, Int Biodeterior Biodegrad, 57, 93, 10.1016/j.ibiod.2005.10.010 · DOI
  74. Mahmood, 2007, Comparison of anoxic sulfide biooxidation using nitrate/nitrite as electron acceptor, Environ Prog, 26, 169, 10.1002/ep.10201 · DOI
  75. Mahmood, 2007, Anoxic sulfide biooxidation using nitrite as electron acceptor, J Hazard Mater, 147, 249, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.002 · DOI
  76. Manconi, 2007, Combined removal of sulfur compounds and nitrate by autotrophic denitrification in bioaugmented activated sludge system, Biotechnol Bioeng, 98, 551, 10.1002/bit.21383 · DOI
  77. Matin, 1978, Organic nutrition of chemolithotropic bacteria, Annu Rev Microbiol, 32, 433, 10.1146/annurev.mi.32.100178.002245 · DOI
  78. McCartney, 1991, Sulfide inhibition of anaerobic degradation of lactate and acetate, Water Res, 25, 203, 10.1016/0043-1354(91)90030-T · DOI
  79. Midha, 2012, Sulfide oxidation in fluidized bed bioreactor using nylon support material, J Environ Sci, 24, 512, 10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60799-7 · DOI
  80. Moosa, 2006, Product inhibition by sulphide species on biological sulphate reduction for the treatment of acid mine drainage, Hydrometallurgy, 83, 214, 10.1016/j.hydromet.2006.03.026 · DOI
  81. Namgung, 2012, Development of a two-phase bioreactor for the biological removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas, Energy Procedia, 14, 1143, 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.12.1067 · DOI
  82. Nielsen, 2004, Chemical sulfide oxidation of wastewater—effects of pH and temperature, Water Sci Technol, 50, 185, 10.2166/wst.2004.0258 · DOI
  83. O´Flaherty, 1998, Effect of pH on growth kinetics and sulphide toxicity thresholds of a range of methanogenic, syntrophic and sulphate-reducing bacteria, Process Biochem, 33, 555, 10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00018-1 · DOI
  84. Odintsova, 1996, Thermothrix azorensis sp. nov., an obligately chemolithoautotrophic, sulfur-oxidizing, thermophilic bacterium, Int J Syst Bacteriol, 46, 422, 10.1099/00207713-46-2-422 · DOI
  85. Oh, 1998, Development of effective hydrogen sulphide removing equipment using Thiobacillus sp. IW., Environ Pollut, 99, 87, 10.1016/S0269-7491(97)00168-1 · DOI
  86. Okabe, 2007, Succession of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in the microbial community on corroding concrete in sewer systems, Appl Environ Microbiol, 73, 971, 10.1128/AEM.02054-06 · DOI
  87. Omil, 1996, Effect of upward velocity and sulphide concentration on volatile fatty acid degradation in a sulphidogenic granular sludge reactor, Process Biochem, 31, 699, 10.1016/S0032-9592(96)00015-5 · DOI
  88. Omil, 1998, Long-term competition between sulfate reducing and methanogenic bacteria in UASB reactors treating volatile fatty acids, Biotechnol Bioeng, 57, 676, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980320)57:6<676::AID-BIT5>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI
  89. Ongcharit, 1989, Immobilization of an autotrophic bacterium by coculture with floc-forming heterotrophs, Biotechnol Bioeng, 33, 1077, 10.1002/bit.260330817 · DOI
  90. Oude Elfering, 1994, Sulfate reduction in methanogenic bioreactors, FEMS Microbiol Rev, 15, 119, 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1994.tb00130.x · DOI
  91. Oude Elferink, 1998, Characterization of the sulfate-reducing and syntrophic population in granular sludge from a full-scale anaerobic reactor treating papermill wastewater, FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 27, 185, 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1998.tb00536.x · DOI
  92. Oyarzún, 2003, Biofiltration of high concentration of hydrogen sulphide using Thiobacillus thioparus, Process Biochem, 39, 165, 10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00050-5 · DOI
  93. Panza, 2010, Hydrogen sulphide removal from landfill gas, Process Saf Environ Prot, 88, 420, 10.1016/j.psep.2010.07.003 · DOI
  94. Parkin, 1990, Interaction between sulfate reducers and methanogens fed acetate and propionate, Res J Water Pollut Control Fed, 62, 780
  95. Pokorna, 2013, Combination of hydrogen sulphide removal from biogas and nitrogen removal from wastewater, J Res Sci Technol, 10, 41
  96. Potivichayanon, 2006, Hydrogen sulfide removal by a novel fixed-film bioscrubber system, Process Biochem, 41, 708, 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.09.006 · DOI
  97. Reyes-Avila, 2004, Simultaneous biological removal of nitrogen, carbon and sulfur by denitrification, Water Res, 38, 3313, 10.1016/j.watres.2004.04.035 · DOI
  98. Rodríguez Martinez, 2005, Influence of nitrate and sulfate on the anaerobic treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater, Eng Life Sci, 5, 568, 10.1002/elsc.200520101 · DOI
  99. Sagastume, 2003, Changes in physical properties of a compost biofilter treating hydrogen sulfide, J Air Waste Manage Assoc, 53, 1011, 10.1080/10473289.2003.10466249 · DOI
  100. Schmidt, 1987, Sulfur metabolism in Beggiatoa alba, J Bacteriol, 12, 5466, 10.1128/JB.169.12.5466-5472.1987 · DOI
  101. Sorensen, 1980, Inhibition by sulfide of nitric and nitrous-oxide reduction by denitrifying Pseudomonas fluorescens, Appl Environ Microbiol, 39, 105, 10.1128/AEM.39.1.105-108.1980 · DOI
  102. Steudel, 1996, Mechanism of the formation of elemental sulphur from aqueous sulphide in chemical and microbiological desulphurisation processes, Ind Eng Chem Res, 35, 1417, 10.1021/ie950558t · DOI
  103. Sublette, 1987, Oxidation of hydrogen sulfide by mixed cultures of Thiobacillus denitrificans and heterotrophs, Biotechnol Bioeng, 29, 759, 10.1002/bit.260290614 · DOI
  104. Syed, 2006, Removal of hydrogen sulfide from gas streams using biological processes—a review, Can Biosyst Eng, 48, 2.1
  105. Takai, 2006, Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 56, 1725, 10.1099/ijs.0.64255-0 · DOI
  106. Tang, 2009, Bacteria of the sulphur cycle: an overview of microbiology, biokinetics and their role in petroleum and mining industries, Biochem Eng J, 44, 73, 10.1016/j.bej.2008.12.011 · DOI
  107. van der Zee, 2007, Sulfide removal by moderate oxygenation of anaerobic sludge environments, Bioresour Technol, 98, 518, 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.02.011 · DOI
  108. van Houten, 1994, Biological sulphate reduction using gas-lift reactors fed with hydrogen and carbon dioxide as energy and carbon source, Biotechnol Bioeng, 44, 586, 10.1002/bit.260440505 · DOI
  109. Vishniak, 1952, The metabolism of Thiobacillus thioparus. I. The oxidation of thiosulfates, J Bacteriol, 64, 363, 10.1128/JB.64.3.363-373.1952 · DOI
  110. Visser, 1993, Anaerobic degradation of volatile fatty acids at different sulphate concentrations, Appl Environ Microbiol, 40, 549
  111. Visser, 1997, Sulfur production by obligately chemolitroautotrphic thiobacillus species, Appl Environ Microbiol, 63, 2300, 10.1128/AEM.63.6.2300-2305.1997 · DOI
  112. Vlasceanu, 1997, Characterization of Thiobacillus thioparus LV43 and its distribution in a chemoautotrophically based groundwater ecosystem, Appl Environ Microbiol, 63, 3123, 10.1128/AEM.63.8.3123-3127.1997 · DOI
  113. Weijma, 2000, Optimalization of sulphate reduction in a methanol-fed thermophilic bioreactor, Water Res, 36, 1825, 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00390-6 · DOI
  114. Weijma, 2003, The effect of sulphate on methanol conversion in mesophilic upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactors, Process Biochem, 38, 1259, 10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00002-5 · DOI
  115. Wiemann, 1998, Anaerobic treatment of tannery wastewater with simultaneous sulphide elimination, Water Res, 32, 774, 10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00309-6 · DOI
  116. Yavuz, 2007, Autotrophic removal of sulfide from industrial wastewaters using oxygen and nitrate as electron acceptors, Environ Eng Sci, 24, 457, 10.1089/ees.2006.0068 · DOI
  117. Zhang, 2008, Chemical and biological technologies for hydrogen sulfide emission control in sewer systems: a review, Water Res, 42, 1, 10.1016/j.watres.2007.07.013 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pokorna, D., & Zabranska, J.
Venue
Biotechnology Advances
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
1246-1259
ISSN
0734-9750
DOI
10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.02.007
Cited by
414
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
Technologická Agentura České Republiky (TA01020798)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review