The DOI matches its Crossref record; 113 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lung-protective ventilation for the surgical patient: international expert panel-based consensus recommendations
Open accessAbstract
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) occur frequently and are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Evidence suggests that reduction of PPCs can be accomplished by using lung-protective ventilation strategies intraoperatively, but a consensus on perioperative management has not been established. We sought to determine recommendations for lung protection for the surgical patient at an international consensus development conference. Seven experts produced 24 questions concerning preoperative assessment and intraoperative mechanical ventilation for patients at risk of developing PPCs. Six researchers assessed the literature using questions as a framework for their review. The modified Delphi method was utilised by a team of experts to produce recommendations and statements from study questions. An expert consensus was reached for 22 recommendations and four statements. The following are the highlights: (i) a dedicated score should be used for preoperative pulmonary risk evaluation; and (ii) an individualised mechanical ventilation may improve the mechanics of breathing and respiratory function, and prevent PPCs. The ventilator should initially be set to a tidal volume of 6–8 ml kg −1 predicted body weight and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cm H 2 O. PEEP should be individualised thereafter. When recruitment manoeuvres are performed, the lowest effective pressure and shortest effective time or fewest number of breaths should be used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 · Cited by 26,092
Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity
LYNN, M. R. (1986) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017 · Cited by 6,775
the delphi method: techniques and applications
Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 5,231
Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Amato, M. B. P., Meade, M. O., Slutsky, A. S., Brochard, L., Costa, E. L. V., Schoenfeld, D. A., Stewart, T. E., Briel, M., Talmor, D., Mercat, A., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1410639 · Cited by 2,801
The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications
J., J. E., Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1976) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1268751 · Cited by 2,228
Fan, E., Del Sorbo, L., Goligher, E. C., Hodgson, C. L., Munshi, L., Walkey, A. J., Adhikari, N. K. J., Amato, M. B. P., Branson, R., Brower, R. G., et al. (2017) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201703-0548st · Cited by 1,630
Prediction of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in a Population-based Surgical Cohort
Canet, J., Gallart, L., Gomar, C., Paluzie, G., Vallès, J., Castillo, J., Sabaté, S., Mazo, V., Briones, Z., & Sanchis, J. (2010) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e3181fc6e0a · Cited by 1,459
A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery
Futier, E., Constantin, J.-M., Paugam-Burtz, C., Pascal, J., Eurin, M., Neuschwander, A., Marret, E., Beaussier, M., Gutton, C., Lefrant, J.-Y., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1301082 · Cited by 1,434
Self-citationAtkins, D., Eccles, M., Flottorp, S., Guyatt, G. H., Henry, D., Hill, S., Liberati, A., O'Connell, D., Oxman, A. D., Phillips, B., et al. (2004) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-4-38 · Cited by 1,235
Writing Group for the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (ART) Investigators, Cavalcanti, A. B., Suzumura, É. A., Laranjeira, L. N., Paisani, D. D. M., Damiani, L. P., Guimarães, H. P., Romano, E. R., Regenga, M. D. M., Taniguchi, L. N. T., et al. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.14171 · Cited by 1,018
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, C. C., Harris, E. M., Vacchiano, C., Bodnar, S., Bukowy, B., Elliott, R. R. D., Migliarese, J., Ragains, C., Trethewey, B., Woodward, A., Gama de Abreu, M., Girard, M., Futier, E., Mulier, J. P., Pelosi, P., & Sprung, J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Anaesthesia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 898-913
- ISSN
- 0007-0912 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2979045572
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 113
- FWCI
- 26.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lung-protective ventilation for the surgical patient: international expert panel-based consensus recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.017
- The paper
- Young, C. C., Harris, E. M., Vacchiano, C., Bodnar, S., Bukowy, B., Elliott, R. R. D., Migliarese, J., Ragains, C., Trethewey, B., Woodward, A., Gama de Abreu, M., Girard, M., Futier, E., Mulier, J. P., Pelosi, P., & Sprung, J. (2019). Lung-protective ventilation for the surgical patient: international expert panel-based consensus recommendations. British Journal of Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
