Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 12Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesHead and Neck Cancer StudiesReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of reconstructive microsurgery on patients with cancer of the head and neck: a prospective study of quality of life, particularly in older patients

Segna, E., Bolzoni, A.R., Giannì, A.B., Baj, A., Beltramini, G.A.·2018·British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract

Treatment of cancer of the head and neck often requires extended resection and major reconstructive surgery, both of which can have great functional and emotional impact. It is fundamental to evaluate the outcome with respect not only to the clinical aspects but also to the quality of life (QoL) perceived by the patients. In the light of the reported increasing incidence of oral cancer in older patients, we decided to see if there was an association between QoL and age. Between June 2015 and December 2016 we submitted the Italian version of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) to 30 patients (mean (range) age 65.5 (23-87) years) who had had resection and microsurgical reconstruction at the Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico of Milan. The questionnaires were completed before operation, and 12 months afterwards, and clinical and personal data were also collected. From the results of SF-36 we obtained the Short Form 12 (SF-12), Physical Health Composite Score (PCS), and Mental Health Composite Score (MCS) and looked at how age influences the variation in QoL scores. The variation between SF-36 and SF-12 results (preoperatively and postoperatively) did not seem to correlate with age. Our study confirmed that reconstructive microsurgery can be realistically proposed to older as well as younger patients because, according to the QoL index, older patients are able to manage (and therefore take advantage of) this complex surgical technique.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.09.003

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Segna, E., Bolzoni, A. R., Giannì, A. B., Baj, A., & Beltramini, G. A.
Affiliations
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Segna, E.
Venue
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
56
Issue
9
Pages
830-834
ISSN
0266-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2894612763
Cited by
12
References
25
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Keywords
head and neck cancer, microsurgical reconstruction, quality of life, elderly patients, oral cancer, SF-36, SF-12, physical and mental health, postoperative outcomes, maxillofacial reconstruction
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Microsurgery, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Plastic Surgery Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review