Long-term results of posterior suturing with postauricular fascial flap otoplasty.
Abstract
Background Posterior suturing with postauricular fascial flap otoplasty has previously been shown to be associated with a significantly reduced rate of complications and better aesthetic outcome when compared with the anterior scoring and posterior suturing techniques. This study evaluates the long-term results of this technique.Material and methods A retrospective casenote analysis of all paediatric patients who underwent otoplasty within a four-year period were retrieved. Sixty patients (112 ears) met the inclusion criteria (mean age 8.5 years; range 4 to 14). The perpendicular distance from the mastoid to the helical rim at the Frankfort line was recorded preoperatively and immediately postoperatively. Patients were invited to a follow up clinic where further measurements were taken by two observers. Photographs were evaluated by an independent blinded observer.Results The clinical recurrence rate was 4.5%. Thirty patients (57 ears) attended the follow-up clinic (mean 3.9 years since surgery). Mean loss of medialisation was 0.7 mm (6.2%), with loss of medialisation of > or =1 mm seen in 26 ears (46%), and improvement in medialisation of > or =1 mm in 15 ears (26%). Mean visual analogue scores for overall appearance and symmetry were higher at follow-up than at six weeks postoperatively. There was no relationship between measurements or visual analogue scores and duration since surgery.Conclusions In conclusion posterior suturing with braided polyester permanent sutures covered with a postauricular fascial flap results in longevity of postoperative appearance and symmetry with low clinical recurrence rates and with excellent patient and parent satisfaction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other noncomparative cohorts describing a cartilage-sparing technique with a postauricular flap have reported similarly low incidences of extrusion ranging from 0% to 3%, and recurrence rates ranging from 0% to 8% of ears.
“Other noncomparative cohorts describing a cartilage-sparing technique with a postauricular flap have reported similarly low incidences of extrusion ranging from 0% to 3%, as well as recurrence rates ranging from 0% to 8% of ears. 19,22-24,28”
Schaverien et al reported a 4.5% recurrence rate in 60 pediatric patients with a follow-up of more than 3.9 years, with minimal medialization loss and high satisfaction.
“Schaverien et al84 reported a 4.5% recurrence rate in 60 pediatric patients with a follow-up of more than 3.9 years, with minimal medialization loss and high satisfaction.”
From Otoplasty Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes: A Practical Review (2026) · cites this paper as [84]
Supportive techniques aim to reduce both recurrence and suture-related complications by providing a well-vascularized tissue barrier over the suture line.
“To address these limitations, several supportive techniques have been introduced, with particular emphasis on the postauricular fascial flap and its variations (e.g., perichondrio-adipo-dermal flap and modified bilateral fascioperichondrial flap). These methods aim to reduce both recurrence and suture-related complications by providing a well-vascularized tissue barrier over the suture line [15,16”
From Comparative Analysis of Mustardé, Fascioperichondrial Flap, and Combined Otoplasty Techniques: Clinical Outcomes and Recurrence Rates in 365 Patients (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Several studies have modified cartilage-sparing otoplasty by including a postauricular fascial flap to cover the postauricular sutures.
“Several studies have modified cartilage-sparing otoplasty by including a postauricular fascial flap to cover the postauricular sutures. 17,19-30”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Schaverien, M. V., Al-Busaidi, S., & Stewart, K. J.
- Affiliations
- Royal Hospital for Children (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Stewart, K.J.
- ORCID
- Schaverien, M.V.
- Venue
- Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1447-1451
- ISSN
- 1748-6815 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977876779
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
- Keywords
- otoplasty, pediatric patients, recurrence, ear symmetry, long-term outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Child, Child, Preschool, Ear, External, Esthetics, Fascia, Female, Humans, Male, Postoperative Complications, Retrospective Studies, Otologic Surgical Procedures, Surgical Flaps, Suture Techniques, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review