Cited by 36Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineNerve injury and regenerationNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Development of a decellularization method to produce nerve allografts using less invasive detergents and hyper/hypotonic solutions

Kim, Jae Kwang, Koh, Young-Do, Kim, Jong Oh, Seo, Dong Hyuk·2016·Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery

Abstract

Background Here, we describe a novel method of processing decellularized nerve grafts using osmotic effects of hypotonic and hypertonic solutions and Triton X-100 (a nonionic detergent) and CHAPS (an amphoteric detergent). Materials and methods To evaluate decellularization, the devised method and Hudson's method were compared with respect to remaining cellular components (as assessed by H&E staining and S-100 immunoreactivity) and extracellular matrix structural integrity (as assessed by H&E staining and laminin immunoreactivity) by using rat sciatic nerves. In addition, a 1.5-cm sciatic nerve gap rat model was treated by implanting decellularized nerve grafts prepared using the devised method, Hudson's method, or an autograft to evaluate nerve regeneration. Nerve histomorphometry of distal stumps and wet muscle mass were evaluated at 12 weeks after implantation. Results The devised method produced outcomes similar to those of Hudson's method in terms of cellular component removal, but the devised method was significantly better in terms of ECM preservation. Histomorphometric study showed that the devised method produced significantly fewer nerve fiber and axonal densities than autografting, but much more than Hudson's method. The wet muscle mass of the devised method was also significantly lower than that of autografting, but much higher than that of Hudson's method. Conclusion The described process for producing decellularized nerve grafts yielded better outcomes with respect to peripheral nerve regeneration than the established ionic detergent-based methods in a rat model. This study indicates that decellularized nerve grafts produced in this manner show favorable nerve regeneration used for bridging nerve gaps.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.08.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although hypertonic solutions are efficient in removing proteins and hypotonic solutions are efficient in removing nuclei and DNA, they may not completely eliminate cellular residues and may require additional treatment to facilitate removal of cellular debris.

    “Although hypertonic solutions are efficient in removing proteins and hypotonic solutions are efficient in removing nuclei and DNA, they may not completely eliminate cellular residues and may require additional treatment to facilitate the removal of cellular debris [117,119,120].”
  • Immersion and agitation constitute a relatively straightforward decellularization method commonly used for thin tissues and smaller organs lacking vascular access.

    “Immersion and agitation constitute a relatively straightforward decellularization method commonly used for thin tissues and smaller organs lacking vascular access, such as the esophagus, small intestine submucosa, urinary bladder, blood vessels, trachea, skin, cornea, and nerve [117,119,120,126,152,[163], [164], [165], [166], [167]].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J. K., Koh, Y.-D., Kim, J. O., & Seo, D. H.
Affiliations
Ewha Womans University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Jae Kwang
Venue
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
69
Issue
12
Pages
1690-1696
ISSN
1748-6815 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2520233475
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of South Korea (NRF-2013R1A1A2059906)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
peripheral nerve allografts, Triton X-100, CHAPS, extracellular matrix preservation, nerve regeneration, sciatic nerve gap, autograft comparison, rat model
MeSH terms
Animals, Detergents, Models, Anatomic, Nerve Regeneration, Sciatic Nerve, Transplantation, Homologous, Tissue and Organ Harvesting, Models, Animal, Rats, Allografts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review