Cited by 41Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyPregnancy-related medical research

Effectiveness of graded activity versus physiotherapy in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: midterm follow up results of a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Magalhães, Maurício Oliveira, Comachio, Josielli, Ferreira, Paulo Henrique, Pappas, Evangelos, Marques, Amélia Pasqual·2018·Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy

Abstract

Background Low back pain (LBP) is a major health and economic problem worldwide. Graded activity and physiotherapy are commonly used interventions for nonspecific low back pain. However, there is currently little evidence to support the use of one intervention over the other in the medium-term.Objective To compare the effectiveness of graded activity exercises to physiotherapy-based exercises at mid-term (three and six months' post intervention) in patients with chronic nonspecific LBP.Methods Sixty-six patients were randomly allocated to two groups: graded activity group (n=33) and physiotherapy group (n=33). These patients received individual sessions twice a week for six weeks. Follow-up measurements were taken at three and six months. The main outcome measurements were intensity pain (Pain Numerical Rating Scale) and disability (Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire).Results No significant differences between groups after three and six month-follow ups were observed. Both groups showed similar outcomes for pain intensity at three months [between group differences: -0.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]=-1.5 to 1.2)] and six months [0.1 (95% CI=-1.1 to 1.5)], disability at three months was [-0.6 (95% CI=-3.4 to 2.2)] and six months [0.0 (95% CI=-2.9 to 3.0)].Conclusion The results of this study suggest that graded activity and physiotherapy have similar effects in the medium-term for patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.07.002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence is conflicting for the effectiveness of combined psychological approaches delivered with physiotherapy care for improving health related quality of life compared with physiotherapy care alone.

    “Evidence is conflicting for the effectiveness of combined psychological approaches delivered with physiotherapy care for improving health related quality of life, compared with physiotherapy care alone (ranging from no effect90 to a significant effect at short term91 or long term follow-up92 93).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 41

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [28]de Souza F.S. Marinho Cda S. Siqueira F.B. Maher C.G. Costa L.O. Psychometric testing confirms that the Brazilian-Portuguese adaptations, the original versions of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia have similar measurement properties Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33 9 2008 1028 1033 18427325
  2. [34]Lopez-de-Uralde-Villanueva I. Munoz-Garcia D. Gil-Martinez A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of graded activity and graded exposure for chronic nonspecific low back pain Pain Med 2015 26235368

Authors
Magalhães, M. O., Comachio, J., Ferreira, P. H., Pappas, E., & Marques, A. P.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Comachio, Josielli
Venue
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
82-91
ISSN
1413-3555 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2734670091
Cited by
41
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
chronic non-specific low back pain, graded activity, physiotherapy, exercise therapy, pain intensity, disability, mid-term follow-up, treatment effectiveness comparison
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Exercise Therapy, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Exercise, Treatment Outcome, Low Back Pain, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review