Cited by 20Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Analysis of the measurement properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 in patients with fibromyalgia

Open access
Salvador, Evany Maira Espirito Santo, Franco, Katherinne Ferro Moura, Miyamoto, Gisela Cristiane, Franco, Yuri Rafael dos Santos, Cabral, Cristina Maria Nunes·2021·Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy

Abstract

Objective To analyze the measurement properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 in patients with fibromyalgia. Methods Assessment was made at three time points: baseline (n=130) and 15 days (n=54) and eight weeks after baseline (n=51). Data collected at baseline were used to assess internal consistency, criterion and construct validity, and ceiling and floor effects. Data collected at baseline and 15 days after baseline were used to assess reliability and measurement error, and data collected before and after an eight-week exercise-based physical therapy intervention were used to assess interpretability of change scores. Results The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.77; alpha if item deleted: 0.74-0.77), substantial reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 2,1=0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.75, 0.90), good measurement error (standard error of measurement: 2.65 points), and a minimal detectable change (90% confidence) of 6.16 points. For validity, the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 showed a positive and good correlation with the original Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (r=0.84, p<0.01), positive and moderate correlation with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (r=0.55, p<0.01), positive and weak correlation with the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (r=0.25, p<0.01), positive and moderate correlation with the Beck Depression Inventory (r=0.39, p<0.01), and no correlation with the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (r=0.11, p=0.23). Kinesiophobia, pain, function, catastrophizing, and depression statistically improved after the eight-week intervention (p<0.01). Conclusion The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 is consistent, reliable, and appropriate to assess fear of movement in patients with fibromyalgia in the clinical context. Responsiveness of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 should be tested in future studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.05.004

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing are strongly associated with decreased physical performance, reduced postural control, and muscle weakness in fibromyalgia.

    “Kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing are prevalent in FM and are strongly associated with decreased physical performance, reduced postural control, and muscle weakness,9,17,29”

    From A Review of Movement and Functional Impairments in Fibromyalgia: Implications for Targeted Treatment (2025) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Introduction says kinesiophobia is common in fibromyalgia and is linked to reduced physical activity and increased disability. The Results report a moderate correlation between kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing, but no correlation with the study’s activity-specific function measure. Neither the Results nor the Discussion supports the claimed strong associations with decreased physical performance, reduced postural control, or muscle weakness; the paper also does not establish that pain catastrophizing is prevalent in fibromyalgia. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing are prevalent in fibromyalgia.

    “Kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing are prevalent in FM and are strongly associated with decreased physical performance, reduced postural control, and muscle weakness,9,17,29”

    From A Review of Movement and Functional Impairments in Fibromyalgia: Implications for Targeted Treatment (2025) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Introduction says kinesiophobia is commonly found in patients with fibromyalgia. The Results measure pain catastrophizing and report its correlation with kinesiophobia, but do not establish that pain catastrophizing is prevalent in fibromyalgia. No page numbers are provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Kinesiophobia was reported in patients with FM due to the association between pain, fatigue and movement, and was associated with reduced levels of physical activity, increased disability, and perpetuation of pain.

    “Kinesiophobia was reported in patients with FM due to the association between pain, fatigue and movement, and was associated with reduced levels of physical activity, increased disability, and perpetuation of pain.17,29,30”
  • Psychological factors contribute to decreased movement in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

    “The influence of psychological factors is already well described in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain contributing to decreased movement.10,29”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. [1]Turk D.C., Robinson J.P., Burwinkle T. Prevalence of fear of pain and activity in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. J Pain. 2004;5(9):483–490. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  2. [2]Asmundson G.J., Vlaeyen J.W.S., Crombez G. Oxford University Press; USA: 2004. Understanding and Treating Fear of Pain. [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]Vlaeyen J.W., Linton S.J. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain. 2000;85(3):317–332. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00242-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Korri S., Miller R., Todd D. Kinesiophobia: a new view of chronic pain behaviour. Pain Manag. 1990;3:35–43. [Google Scholar]
  5. [6]Picavet H.S., Vlaeyen J.W., Schouten J.S. Pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia: predictors of chronic low back pain. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156(11):1028–1034. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  6. [7]Gunn A.H., Schwartz T.A., Arbeeva L.S. Fear of movement and associated factors among adults with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017;69(12):1826–1833. doi: 10.1002/acr.23226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. [8]Feleus A., van Dalen T., Bierma-Zeinstra S.M. Kinesiophobia in patients with non-traumatic arm, neck and shoulder complaints: a prospective cohort study in general practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  8. [9]Hapidou E.G., O’Brien M.A., Pierrynowski M.R., de las Heras E., Patel M., Patla T. Fear and avoidance of movement in people with chronic pain: psychometric properties of the 11-Item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) Physiother Can. 2012;64(3):235–241. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2011-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  9. [10]Lüning Bergsten C., Lundberg M., Lindberg P., Elfving B. Change in kinesiophobia and its relation to activity limitation after multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic back pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(10):852–858. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.624247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. [11]Siqueira F.B., Teixeira-Salmela L.F., de Castro Magalhães L. Análise das propriedades psicométricas da versão brasileira da escala tampa de cinesiofobia Analysis of the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version the tampa scale for kinesiophobia. Acta Ortop Bras. 2007;15(1):19–24. [Google Scholar]
  11. [13]Larsson C., Hansson E.E., Sundquist K., Jakobsson U. Psychometric properties of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) among older people with chronic pain. Physiother Theory Pract. 2014;30(6):421–428. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2013.877546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  12. [15]Franco K.F.M., Franco Y.R.S., Salvador E.M.E.S., Nascimento B.C.B., Miyamoto G.C., Cabral C.M.N. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the modified Pilates method versus aerobic exercise in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Rheumatol. 2019;3:2. doi: 10.1186/s41927-018-0051-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  13. [17]de Souza F.S., da Silva Marinho C., Siqueira F.B., Maher C.G., Costa L.O.P. Psychometric testing confirms that the Brazilian-Portuguese adaptations, the original versions of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia have similar measurement properties. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33(9):1028–1033. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. [18]Costa L.O.P., Maher C.G., Latimer J. Clinimetric testing of three self-report outcome measures for low back pain patients in Brazil: which one is the best? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33(22):2459–2463. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181849dbe. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  15. [19]Sehn F., Chachamovich E., Vidor L.P. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Pain Med. 2012;13(11):1425–1435. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01492.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. [20]Gomes-Oliveira M.H., Gorenstein C., Lotufo Neto F., Andrade L.H., Wang Y.P. Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Beck Depression Inventory-II in a community sample. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2012;34(4):389–394. doi: 10.1016/j.rbp.2012.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. [22]Whaley M.H., Brubaker P.H., Otto R.M., Armstrong L.E. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia, Pa: 2006. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. [Google Scholar]
  18. [23]Marques A., Yuan S., Matsutani L., Santos A. 2014. Programa de atualização em fisioterapia esportiva e traumato-ortopédica. Porto Alegre, Secad. [Google Scholar]
  19. [24]Bidonde J., Busch A.J., Bath B., Milosavljevic S. Exercise for adults with fibromyalgia: an umbrella systematic review with synthesis of best evidence. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2014;10(1):45–79. doi: 10.2174/1573403x10666140914155304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  20. [26]Hauser W., Klose P., Langhorst J. Efficacy of different types of aerobic exercise in fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(3):R79. doi: 10.1186/ar3002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  21. [27]Borg G.A. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377–381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. [28]Jones K.D., Burckhardt C.S., Deodhar A.A., Perrin N.A., Hanson G.C., Bennett R.M. A six-month randomized controlled trial of exercise and pyridostigmine in the treatment of fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(2):612–622. doi: 10.1002/art.23203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  23. [29]de Vet H.C., Terwee C.B., Mokkink L.B., Knol D.L. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge: 2011. Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide. [Google Scholar]
  24. [30]Prinsen C.A.C., Mokkink L.B., Bouter L.M. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147–1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  25. [31]Terwee C.B., Bot S.D., de Boer M.R. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  26. [32]de Vet H.C., Terwee C.B., Knol D.L., Bouter L.M. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(10):1033–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  27. [33]Enderlein G., Fleiss J. Wiley; New York, Chichester, Brislane, Toronto, Singapore: 1986. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. [Google Scholar]
  28. [34]Mokkink L.B., Prinsen C.A., Bouter L.M., Vet H.C., Terwee C.B. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016;20(2):105–113. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  29. [35]Turk D.C., Wilson H.D. Fear of pain as a prognostic factor in chronic pain: conceptual models, assessment, and treatment implications. Curr Pain Headache R. 2010;14(2):88–95. doi: 10.1007/s11916-010-0094-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  30. [36]Pincus T., Smeets R.J., Simmonds M.J., Sullivan M.J. The fear avoidance model disentangled: improving the clinical utility of the fear avoidance model. Clin J Pain. 2010;26(9):739–746. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181f15d45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  31. [37]Porter-Moffitt S., Gatchel R.J., Robinson R.C. Biopsychosocial profiles of different pain diagnostic groups. J Pain. 2006;7(5):308–318. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  32. [39]Häuser W., Ablin J., Perrot S., Fitzcharles M.A. Management of fibromyalgia: key messages from recent evidence-based guidelines. Polish Arch Int Med. 2017;2017:127. doi: 10.20452/pamw.3877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salvador, E. M. E. S., Franco, K. F. M., Miyamoto, G. C., Franco, Y. R. D. S., & Cabral, C. M. N.
Affiliations
Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Cabral, Cristina Maria Nunes
Venue
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
168-174
ISSN
1413-3555 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3029944930
Cited by
20
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
kinesiophobia, fibromyalgia, Brazilian version, measurement properties, psychometric validation, pain catastrophizing, minimal detectable change, responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects
MeSH terms
Brazil, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Fear, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Movement, Pain, Phobic Disorders, Portugal, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Catastrophization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review