Selective CDK6 degradation mediated by cereblon, VHL, and novel IAP-recruiting PROTACs
Abstract
Inhibitors of CDK4 and CDK6 have emerged as important FDA-approved treatment options for breast cancer patients. The properties and pharmacology of CDK4/6 inhibitor medicines have been extensively profiled, and investigations into the degradation of these targets via a PROTAC strategy have also been reported. PROTACs are a novel class of small-molecules that offer the potential for differentiated pharmacology compared to traditional inhibitors by redirecting the cellular ubiquitin-proteasome system to degrade target proteins of interest. We report here the preparation of palbociclib-based PROTACs that incorporate binders for three different E3 ligases, including a novel IAP-binder, which effectively degrade CDK4 and CDK6 in cells. In addition, we show that the palbociclib-based PROTACs in this study that recruit different E3 ligases all exhibit preferential CDK6 vs. CDK4 degradation selectivity despite employing a selection of linkers between the target binder and the E3 ligase binder.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multiple studies have described numerous CRBN-recruiting dual-selective degraders and CDK6-selective degraders, but none report CDK4-selective degraders; the only reported CDK4-selective degraders are built on ribociclib.
“Whereas multiple studies have described numerous CRBN-recruiting dual-selective degraders and CDK6-selective degraders 70–73, none report CDK4-selective degraders; the only reported CDK4-selective degraders are built on a slightly different warhead, ribociclib 74.”
From Rationalizing PROTAC-Mediated Ternary Complex Formation Using Rosetta (2021) · cites this paper as [71]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Anderson, N. A., Cryan, J., Ahmed, A., Dai, H., McGonagle, G. A., Rozier, C., & Benowitz, A. B.
- Affiliations
- GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Benowitz, Andrew B.
- Venue
- Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 127106
- ISSN
- 0960-894X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3010955175
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 3.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Keywords
- PROTACs, CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, cereblon, VHL, E3 ubiquitin ligase, ubiquitin-proteasome system, selective protein degradation, breast cancer, linker effects
- MeSH terms
- Antineoplastic Agents, Humans, Oligopeptides, Drug Design, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Jurkat Cells, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6, Von Hippel-Lindau Tumor Suppressor Protein, Proteasome Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review