Cited by 69Protein Degradation and InhibitorsAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesUbiquitin and proteasome pathways

Selective CDK6 degradation mediated by cereblon, VHL, and novel IAP-recruiting PROTACs

Anderson, Niall A., Cryan, Jenni, Ahmed, Adil, Dai, Han, McGonagle, Grant A., Rozier, Christine, Benowitz, Andrew B.·2020·Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters

Abstract

Inhibitors of CDK4 and CDK6 have emerged as important FDA-approved treatment options for breast cancer patients. The properties and pharmacology of CDK4/6 inhibitor medicines have been extensively profiled, and investigations into the degradation of these targets via a PROTAC strategy have also been reported. PROTACs are a novel class of small-molecules that offer the potential for differentiated pharmacology compared to traditional inhibitors by redirecting the cellular ubiquitin-proteasome system to degrade target proteins of interest. We report here the preparation of palbociclib-based PROTACs that incorporate binders for three different E3 ligases, including a novel IAP-binder, which effectively degrade CDK4 and CDK6 in cells. In addition, we show that the palbociclib-based PROTACs in this study that recruit different E3 ligases all exhibit preferential CDK6 vs. CDK4 degradation selectivity despite employing a selection of linkers between the target binder and the E3 ligase binder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bmcl.2020.127106

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple studies have described numerous CRBN-recruiting dual-selective degraders and CDK6-selective degraders, but none report CDK4-selective degraders; the only reported CDK4-selective degraders are built on ribociclib.

    “Whereas multiple studies have described numerous CRBN-recruiting dual-selective degraders and CDK6-selective degraders 70–73, none report CDK4-selective degraders; the only reported CDK4-selective degraders are built on a slightly different warhead, ribociclib 74.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 69

Authors
Anderson, N. A., Cryan, J., Ahmed, A., Dai, H., McGonagle, G. A., Rozier, C., & Benowitz, A. B.
Affiliations
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Benowitz, Andrew B.
Venue
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
127106
ISSN
0960-894X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3010955175
Cited by
69
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
Keywords
PROTACs, CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, cereblon, VHL, E3 ubiquitin ligase, ubiquitin-proteasome system, selective protein degradation, breast cancer, linker effects
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Humans, Oligopeptides, Drug Design, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Jurkat Cells, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6, Von Hippel-Lindau Tumor Suppressor Protein, Proteasome Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review