CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 454Psychometric Methodologies and TestingEating Disorders and BehaviorsHealth Education and Validation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 300 of the 300 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Translation and validation of body image instruments: Challenges, good practice guidelines, and reporting recommendations for test adaptation

Open access
Swami, Viren, Barron, David·2019·Body Image
DOI 10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.014
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Body image research has grown rapidly to include new cultural and linguistic populations, but this gives rise to a need for measurement instruments that are sensitive to local contextual variations while remaining equivalent across groups. Test adaptation, or the translation and validation of a source instrument for use in a new cultural group, is an important part of this process. Here, we offer an operational framework for conducting effective test adaptation. We cover good-practice guidelines for instrument translation and suggest effective strategies for achieving semantic equivalence of translated instruments. We also focus on measurement invariance and provide good-practice and reporting guidelines for conducting exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Finally, we suggest good-practice guidelines for demonstrating that scores on translated measures have good reliability and validity. It is our hope that the availability of this article will assist body image scholars seeking to conduct robust test adaptations of existing measurement tools.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.014

Cites

300 of 300 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Items 201–300 of 300

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Malpass, 1986, Strategies for design and analysis, Vol. 8
  2. Reichenheim, 2007, Operationalizing the cross-cultural adaptation of epidemiological measurement instruments, Revista de Saúde Pública, 41, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 454

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Swami, V., & Barron, D.
Affiliations
Perdana University (MY)
Corresponding author
Swami, Viren
ORCID
Venue
Body Image
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
31
Pages
204-220
ISSN
1740-1445 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.014
OpenAlex
W2891657677
Cited by
454
References
300
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 13
FWCI
21.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Body Image (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Anglia Ruskin Research Online (Anglia Ruskin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
test adaptation, instrument translation, cross-cultural adaptation, semantic equivalence, measurement invariance, factor analysis, reliability and validity, psychometric validation, good practice guidelines
MeSH terms
Body Image, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Psychometrics, Translating, Reproducibility of Results, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Validation Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review