The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effectiveness of interventions aiming to promote positive body image in adults: A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Theory suggests promoting positive body image (PBI) through interventions would have a significant impact on health and well-being. However, little is known about the effectiveness of existing interventions. This review aimed to identify and assess the evidence of effectiveness of interventions to increase PBI in adults. Database searches were conducted using CINAHL Plus, Medline, PsychINFO, Wiley Online Library, and SCOPUS. Application of inclusion criteria and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers. Methodological quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool, and narrative synthesis was conducted. Fifteen studies, evaluating 13 interventions, were included. Three studies, evaluating one online writing-based functionality intervention, were judged to have strong methodological quality and had evidence of improving body appreciation, body esteem, and functionality satisfaction. Six moderate quality studies found interventions using intuitive eating, CBT, self-compassion, and exercise improved PBI. There was limited evidence of effectiveness of interventions for men, suggesting future research is needed to better understand PBI mechanisms in men. Lack of heterogeneity of outcome measures is discussed as a limitation. Findings suggest existing interventions are effective at increasing aspects of PBI among women and support the development of interventions that target multiple components of PBI.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Cognitive behavioral therapy is vital in this effort, as it helps individuals unravel negative perceptions and adopt healthier attitudes toward their bodies [206].”
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savovic, J., Schulz, K. F., Weeks, L., Sterne, J. A. C., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928 · Cited by 33,817
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Self-Compassion: An Alternative Conceptualization of a Healthy Attitude Toward Oneself
NEFF, K. (2003) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298860309032 · Cited by 5,440
The well-built clinical question: A key to evidence-based decisions
(1995) · ACP Journal Club · doi:10.7326/acpjc-1995-123-3-a12 · Cited by 2,931
Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies
Deeks, J., Dinnes, J., D'Amico, R., Sowden, A., Sakarovitch, C., Song, F., Petticrew, M., & Altman, D. (2003) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta7270 · Cited by 2,907 · cited 1×
“Additionally, it has established construct and content validity (Jackson & Waters, 2005), and is reported to be suitable for reviews of effectiveness (Deeks et al., 2003).”
BackgroundA pilot study and randomized controlled trial of the mindful self-compassion program
Neff, K. D., & Germer, C. K. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.21923 · Cited by 2,253
Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs
Morris, S. B. (2008) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428106291059 · Cited by 2,133 · cited 1×
“Effect sizes were interpreted as small d = 0.20, medium d = 0.50 and large d = 0.80 (Morris, 2008) (see Table 1).”
BackgroundInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Higgins, 2011, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, Vol. 5.1.0
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Merino, M., Tornero-Aguilera, J. F., Rubio-Zarapuz, A., Villanueva-Tobaldo, C. V., Martín-Rodríguez, A., & Clemente-Suárez, V. J. (2024) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare12141396 · Cited by 349
“These dynamics necessitate careful moderation to capture a broad range of experiences and perspectives accurately [206].”
BackgroundBody functionality: A review of the literature
Alleva, J. M., & Tylka, T. L. (2020) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.11.006 · Cited by 302
Meta-analysis of gender differences in body appreciation
He, J., Sun, S., Zickgraf, H. F., Lin, Z., & Fan, X. (2020) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.011 · Cited by 207
Pedalino, F., & Camerini, A.-L. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19031543 · Cited by 285
“Prior interventions to promote a positive body image among women proved to be effective [54].”
BackgroundAndersen, N., & Swami, V. (2021) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.03.015 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Guest, E., Costa, B., Williamson, H., Meyrick, J., Halliwell, E., & Harcourt, D.
- Affiliations
- University of the West of England (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Guest, Ella
- Venue
- Body Image
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 30
- Pages
- 10-25
- ISSN
- 1740-1445 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2944371810
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.uwe.ac.uk
- Licence
- Locations
- Body Image (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- University of the West of England
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- positive body image, body image interventions, body appreciation, body esteem, intuitive eating, cognitive behavioral therapy, self-compassion, exercise intervention, men's body image, female body image, intervention effectiveness
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Body Image, Empathy, Female, Humans, Male, Self Concept, Exercise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
