Cited by 186Body Image and Dysmorphia StudiesImpact of Technology on AdolescentsEating Disorders and Behaviors

Unique associations of social media use and online appearance preoccupation with depression, anxiety, and appearance rejection sensitivity

Open access
Hawes, Tanya, Zimmer-Gembeck, Melanie J., Campbell, Shawna M.·2020·Body Image

Abstract

Social media (SM) can create a climate of social comparison and preoccupation with appearance, which can pose risks for emotional problems, such as depression and social anxiety. In this study, 763 adolescents and young adults reported time spent and intensity of social media use and preoccupation with both general and appearance-related (AR) social media activities and content. Associations were investigated with markers of depression and social anxiety symptoms and appearance sensitivities - appearance anxiety and appearance rejection sensitivity (appearance-RS). Social media use was positively associated with symptoms of depression, social anxiety, appearance anxiety, and appearance-RS. General and AR preoccupation had unique and positive associations with depression and social anxiety symptoms and with appearance sensitivities. AR preoccupation was also found to strengthen the relationship between time spent on social media and appearance-RS. Although there were gender differences on all measures, with young women scoring higher on all measures, there was no evidence that gender moderated the effects of AR social media preoccupation. Findings support emerging evidence that social media engagement and behavior, particularly activities involving appearance comparisons and judgements, may be more of a risk to depression and social anxiety symptoms and appearance sensitivities than simply the frequency of social media use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A test társadalmi megítélésének növekvő fontossága kedvez a külsővel kapcsolatos érzékenység és szorongás növekedésének, valamint a BDD tünetei megjelenésének.

    “A test társadalmi megítélése egyre fontosabb (Cataldo, De Luca, Giorgetti, Cicconcelli és Bersani, 2021), ez kedvez a küls ő vel kapcsolatos érzékenység és szorongás növekedésének, valamint a BDD tünetei megjelenésének (Hawes, Zimmer-Gembeck és Cambell, 2020; Senín-Calderón és mtsai, 2020).”

    From A testdiszmorfiás zavar pszichológiai vonatkozásai (2023) · cites this paper as Hawes, Zimmer-Gembeck és Cambell, 2020

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 89 · Cited by 186

Authors
Hawes, T., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Campbell, S. M.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hawes, Tanya
Venue
Body Image
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
33
Pages
66-76
ISSN
1740-1445 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008114947
Cited by
186
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
7.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Body Image (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
social media use, appearance concerns, appearance anxiety, depression, social anxiety, adolescents, young adults, social comparison, gender differences, time spent on social media
MeSH terms
Physical Appearance, Body, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Association, Body Image, Child, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Rejection, Psychology, Young Adult, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review