Unique associations of social media use and online appearance preoccupation with depression, anxiety, and appearance rejection sensitivity
Open accessAbstract
Social media (SM) can create a climate of social comparison and preoccupation with appearance, which can pose risks for emotional problems, such as depression and social anxiety. In this study, 763 adolescents and young adults reported time spent and intensity of social media use and preoccupation with both general and appearance-related (AR) social media activities and content. Associations were investigated with markers of depression and social anxiety symptoms and appearance sensitivities - appearance anxiety and appearance rejection sensitivity (appearance-RS). Social media use was positively associated with symptoms of depression, social anxiety, appearance anxiety, and appearance-RS. General and AR preoccupation had unique and positive associations with depression and social anxiety symptoms and with appearance sensitivities. AR preoccupation was also found to strengthen the relationship between time spent on social media and appearance-RS. Although there were gender differences on all measures, with young women scoring higher on all measures, there was no evidence that gender moderated the effects of AR social media preoccupation. Findings support emerging evidence that social media engagement and behavior, particularly activities involving appearance comparisons and judgements, may be more of a risk to depression and social anxiety symptoms and appearance sensitivities than simply the frequency of social media use.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A test társadalmi megítélésének növekvő fontossága kedvez a külsővel kapcsolatos érzékenység és szorongás növekedésének, valamint a BDD tünetei megjelenésének.
“A test társadalmi megítélése egyre fontosabb (Cataldo, De Luca, Giorgetti, Cicconcelli és Bersani, 2021), ez kedvez a küls ő vel kapcsolatos érzékenység és szorongás növekedésének, valamint a BDD tünetei megjelenésének (Hawes, Zimmer-Gembeck és Cambell, 2020; Senín-Calderón és mtsai, 2020).”
From A testdiszmorfiás zavar pszichológiai vonatkozásai (2023) · cites this paper as Hawes, Zimmer-Gembeck és Cambell, 2020
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 89 · Cited by 186
- Authors
- Hawes, T., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Campbell, S. M.
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hawes, Tanya
- Venue
- Body Image
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 33
- Pages
- 66-76
- ISSN
- 1740-1445 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3008114947
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 7.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Body Image (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Keywords
- social media use, appearance concerns, appearance anxiety, depression, social anxiety, adolescents, young adults, social comparison, gender differences, time spent on social media
- MeSH terms
- Physical Appearance, Body, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Association, Body Image, Child, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Rejection, Psychology, Young Adult, Social Media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review