Cited by 242Spaceflight effects on biologyBone health and osteoporosis researchSpace Exploration and Technology

Recovery of spaceflight-induced bone loss: Bone mineral density after long-duration missions as fitted with an exponential function

Open access
Sibonga, J.D., Evans, H.J., Sung, H.G., Spector, E.R., Lang, T.F., Oganov, V.S., Bakulin, A.V., Shackelford, L.C. +1 more·2007·Bone

Abstract

The loss of bone mineral in NASA astronauts during spaceflight has been investigated throughout the more than 40 years of space travel. Consequently, it is a medical requirement at NASA Johnson Space Center (JSC) that changes in bone mass be monitored in crew members by measuring bone mineral density (BMD), with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) before and after flight, of astronauts who serve on long-duration missions (4-6 months). We evaluated this repository of medical data to track whether there is recovery of bone mineral that was lost during spaceflight. Our analysis was supplemented by BMD data from cosmonauts (by convention, a space traveler formally employed by the Russia Aviation and Space Agency or by the previous Soviet Union) who had also flown on long-duration missions. Data from a total of 45 individual crew members - a small number of whom flew on more than one mission - were used in this analysis. Changes in BMD (between 56 different sets of pre- and postflight measurements) were plotted as a function of time (days after landing). Plotted BMD changes were fitted to an exponential mathematical function that estimated: (i) BMD change on landing day (day 0) and (ii) the number of days after landing when 50% of the lost bone would be recovered ("50% recovery time") in the lumbar spine, trochanter, pelvis, femoral neck and calcaneus. In sum, averaged losses of bone mineral after long-duration spaceflight ranged between 2% and 9% across all sites with our recovery model predicting a 50% restoration of bone loss for all sites to be within 9 months.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bone.2007.08.022

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The person-to-person variability of BMD loss observed in the available data is large.

    “An additional limitation of our model is that the person-to-person variability of BMD loss observed in the available data [19,32,33] is large (see Fig 1).”

    From A human mission to Mars: Predicting the bone mineral density loss of astronauts (2020) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) identifies three crew members as outliers with proximal-femur BMD losses exceeding 15%, supporting variation in loss across people. Its explicit statement that outcomes are 'highly variable among crew members' refers to skeletal recovery, however, not to the overall person-to-person variability of BMD loss claimed here. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Long-duration spaceflights induce bone mineral density (BMD) loss in weight-bearing bones, with considerable individual variability.

    “It is well known that long-duration spaceflights induce BMD loss in weight-bearing bones although there is considerable individual variability [6–12].”
  • BMD recovery on Earth in astronauts' bones after spaceflight is well described by an exponential function.

    “In contrast, BMD recovery on Earth in the bones of various astronauts after spaceflights is well described by an exponential function [19].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 242

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lang TF. What do we known about fracture risk in long-duration spaceflight? J Musculoskel Neuron Interaction 2006;6(4):319-321.

Authors
Sibonga, J. D., Evans, H. J., Sung, H. G., Spector, E. R., Lang, T. F., Oganov, V. S., Bakulin, A. V., Shackelford, L. C., & LeBlanc, A. D.
Affiliations
  • Universities Space Research Association (US)
  • Wyle (United States) (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Sibonga, J.D.
Venue
Bone
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
973-978
ISSN
  • 1873-2763 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-3282
OpenAlex
W2141954707
Cited by
242
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bone (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Johnson Space Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
Keywords
bone mineral density, bone recovery, long-duration spaceflight, astronauts, cosmonauts, lumbar spine, femoral neck, calcaneus, trochanter, pelvis
MeSH terms
Adult, Bone Diseases, Metabolic, Female, Humans, Male, Space Flight, Time Factors, Bone Density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review