Mechanisms of protein–ligand association and its modulation by protein mutations
Open accessAbstract
Protein-ligand interactions are essential for nearly all biological processes, and yet the biophysical mechanism that enables potential binding partners to associate before specific binding occurs remains poorly understood. Fundamental questions include which factors influence the formation of protein-ligand encounter complexes, and whether designated association pathways exist. To address these questions, we developed a computational approach to systematically analyze the complete ensemble of association pathways. Here, we use this approach to study the binding of a phosphate ion to the Escherichia coli phosphate-binding protein. Various mutants of the protein are considered, and their effects on binding free-energy profiles, association rates, and association pathway distributions are quantified. The results reveal the existence of two anion attractors, i.e., regions that initially attract negatively charged particles and allow them to be efficiently screened for phosphate, which is subsequently specifically bound. Point mutations that affect the charge on these attractors modulate their attraction strength and speed up association to a factor of 10 of the diffusion limit, and thus change the association pathways of the phosphate ligand. It is demonstrated that a phosphate that prebinds to such an attractor neutralizes its attraction effect to the environment, making the simultaneous association of a second phosphate ion unlikely. This study suggests ways in which structural properties can be used to tune molecular association kinetics so as to optimize the efficiency of binding, and highlights the importance of kinetic properties.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A study using fixed receptor geometry used transition path theory to extract descriptions of unbinding pathways and how these changed in response to receptor point mutations.
“A study that used the simplifying assumption of fixed receptor geometry used the framework transition path theory to extract descriptions of unbinding pathways and how these changed in response to receptor point mutations [57].”
From Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics (2014) · cites this paper as [57]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Held, M., Metzner, P., Prinz, J.-H., & Noé, F.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
- Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Noé, Frank
- ORCID
- Noé, Frank
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 701-710
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3030248
- OpenAlex
- W2007778981
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Diffusion and Search Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
- Keywords
- encounter complex, phosphate-binding protein, Escherichia coli, point mutations, binding free energy, association kinetics, diffusion-limited binding, ligand binding
- MeSH terms
- Kinetics, Ligands, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Thermodynamics, Phosphate-Binding Proteins, Escherichia coli Proteins, Mutant Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review