Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy: Past, Present, Future
Open accessAbstract
In recent years fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) has become a routine method for determining diffusion coefficients, chemical rate constants, molecular concentrations, fluorescence brightness, triplet state lifetimes, and other molecular parameters. FCS measures the spatial and temporal correlation of individual molecules with themselves and so provides a bridge between classical ensemble and contemporary single-molecule measurements. It also provides information on concentration and molecular number fluctuations for nonlinear reaction systems that complement single-molecule measurements. Typically implemented on a fluorescence microscope, FCS samples femtoliter volumes and so is especially useful for characterizing small dynamic systems such as biological cells. In addition to its practical utility, however, FCS provides a window on mesoscopic systems in which fluctuations from steady states not only provide the basis for the measurement but also can have important consequences for the behavior and evolution of the system. For example, a new and potentially interesting field for FCS studies could be the study of nonequilibrium steady states, especially in living cells.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fluorescence offers advantages in the monitoring of biological variables, such as high sensitivity, simplicity and speed, low background, selectivity, and applicability to living organisms in a non-invasive and non-destructive way.
“Fluorescence offers a number of advantages in the monitoring of biological variables, such as its high sensitivity to monitor sub-nanomolar concentrations or even at the level of a single molecule, simplicity and speed, low background due to the differences between excitation and emission wavelengths, selectivity due to the ability to recognize specific fluorophores within a mixture with nonfluore”
From Software sensors in the monitoring of microalgae cultivations (2024) · cites this paper as Elson 2011
Cites
Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell
Elowitz, M. B., Levine, A. J., Siggia, E. D., & Swain, P. S. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070919 · Cited by 5,441 · see citing works
Yarden, Y., & Schlessinger, J. (1987) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00379a035 · Cited by 627 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Khalin, I., Heimburger, D., Melnychuk, N., Collot, M., Groschup, B., Hellal, F., Reisch, A., Plesnila, N., & Klymchenko, A. S. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c01505 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Software sensors in the monitoring of microalgae cultivations
Porras Reyes, L., Havlik, I., & Beutel, S. (2024) · Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology · doi:10.1007/s11157-023-09679-8 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“…due to the differences between excitation and emission wave-lengths, selectivity due to the ability to recognize specific fluorophores within a mixture with non-fluorescent molecules, and its applicability to living organisms in a non-invasive and non-destructive way (Elson 2011; Sá et al. 2020a).”
- Authors
- Elson, E. L.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Elson, Elliot L.
- ORCID
- Elson, Elliot L.
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2855-2870
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3244056
- OpenAlex
- W2032003671
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM084200)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Diffusion Coefficients in Liquids
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
- Keywords
- fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, diffusion coefficient, chemical rate constants, molecular concentration, fluorescence intensity, triplet lifetime, single-molecule measurement, concentration fluctuations, mesoscopic systems, nonequilibrium steady states, living cells
- MeSH terms
- Forecasting, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, Molecular Probe Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review