A Method to Predict Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability of Drug-Like Compounds Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Open accessAbstract
The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is formed by specialized tight junctions between endothelial cells that line brain capillaries to create a highly selective barrier between the brain and the rest of the body. A major problem to overcome in drug design is the ability of the compound in question to cross the BBB. Neuroactive drugs are required to cross the BBB to function. Conversely, drugs that target other parts of the body ideally should not cross the BBB to avoid possible psychotropic side effects. Thus, the task of predicting the BBB permeability of new compounds is of great importance. Two gold-standard experimental measures of BBB permeability are logBB (the concentration of drug in the brain divided by concentration in the blood) and logPS (permeability surface-area product). Both methods are time-consuming and expensive, and although logPS is considered the more informative measure, it is lower throughput and more resource intensive. With continual increases in computer power and improvements in molecular simulations, in silico methods may provide viable alternatives. Computational predictions of these two parameters for a sample of 12 small molecule compounds were performed. The potential of mean force for each compound through a 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine bilayer is determined by molecular dynamics simulations. This system setup is often used as a simple BBB mimetic. Additionally, one-dimensional position-dependent diffusion coefficients are calculated from the molecular dynamics trajectories. The diffusion coefficient is combined with the free energy landscape to calculate the effective permeability (Peff) for each sample compound. The relative values of these permeabilities are compared to experimentally determined logBB and logPS values. Our computational predictions correlate remarkably well with both logBB (R(2) = 0.94) and logPS (R(2) = 0.90). Thus, we have demonstrated that this approach may have the potential to provide reliable, quantitatively predictive BBB permeability, using a relatively quick, inexpensive method.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PAMPA blood-brain barrier controls yielded similar permeability measures as previously reported.
“Verapamil, corticosterone and theophylline were controls for high, intermediate and low permeability, respectively, and yielded similar permeability measures as previously reported [35,39].”
From Polyphenol Microbial Metabolites Exhibit Gut and Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability and Protect Murine Microglia against LPS-Induced Inflammation (2019) · cites this paper as [39]
Cites
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767 · see citing works
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874 · see citing works
Carrier-mediated cellular uptake of pharmaceutical drugs: an exception or the rule?
Dobson, P. D., & Kell, D. B. (2008) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2438 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
The future of molecular dynamics simulations in drug discovery
Borhani, D. W., & Shaw, D. E. (2012) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-011-9517-y · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Diffusion of Macromolecules in the Brain: Implications for Drug Delivery
Wolak, D. J., & Thorne, R. G. (2013) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp300495e · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cao, Y., & Ng, C. (2021) · Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts · doi:10.1039/d1em00228g · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Johnson, S. L., Kirk, R. D., DaSilva, N. A., Ma, H., Seeram, N. P., & Bertin, M. J. (2019) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo9040078 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
- Authors
- Carpenter, T. S., Kirshner, D. A., Lau, E. Y., Wong, S. E., Nilmeier, J. P., & Lightstone, F. C.
- Affiliations
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lightstone, Felice C.
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 630-641
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4129472
- OpenAlex
- W2007070530
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 7.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Laboratory Directed Research and Development (12-SI-004)
- U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (DE-AC52-07NA27344, LLNL-JRNL-648046)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
- Keywords
- blood-brain barrier permeability, drug-like molecules, octanol-water partition coefficient, potential of mean force, DOPC bilayer, position-dependent diffusion coefficient, free energy landscape, effective permeability, tight junctions, in silico prediction, neuroactive drugs
- MeSH terms
- Blood-Brain Barrier, Capillary Permeability, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Models, Biological, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review