Cited by 306Barrier Structure and Function StudiesComputational Drug Discovery MethodsDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

A Method to Predict Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability of Drug-Like Compounds Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Open access
Carpenter, Timothy S., Kirshner, Daniel A., Lau, Edmond Y., Wong, Sergio E., Nilmeier, Jerome P., Lightstone, Felice C.·2014·Biophysical Journal

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is formed by specialized tight junctions between endothelial cells that line brain capillaries to create a highly selective barrier between the brain and the rest of the body. A major problem to overcome in drug design is the ability of the compound in question to cross the BBB. Neuroactive drugs are required to cross the BBB to function. Conversely, drugs that target other parts of the body ideally should not cross the BBB to avoid possible psychotropic side effects. Thus, the task of predicting the BBB permeability of new compounds is of great importance. Two gold-standard experimental measures of BBB permeability are logBB (the concentration of drug in the brain divided by concentration in the blood) and logPS (permeability surface-area product). Both methods are time-consuming and expensive, and although logPS is considered the more informative measure, it is lower throughput and more resource intensive. With continual increases in computer power and improvements in molecular simulations, in silico methods may provide viable alternatives. Computational predictions of these two parameters for a sample of 12 small molecule compounds were performed. The potential of mean force for each compound through a 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine bilayer is determined by molecular dynamics simulations. This system setup is often used as a simple BBB mimetic. Additionally, one-dimensional position-dependent diffusion coefficients are calculated from the molecular dynamics trajectories. The diffusion coefficient is combined with the free energy landscape to calculate the effective permeability (Peff) for each sample compound. The relative values of these permeabilities are compared to experimentally determined logBB and logPS values. Our computational predictions correlate remarkably well with both logBB (R(2) = 0.94) and logPS (R(2) = 0.90). Thus, we have demonstrated that this approach may have the potential to provide reliable, quantitatively predictive BBB permeability, using a relatively quick, inexpensive method.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.024

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carpenter, T. S., Kirshner, D. A., Lau, E. Y., Wong, S. E., Nilmeier, J. P., & Lightstone, F. C.
Affiliations
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Lightstone, Felice C.
Venue
Biophysical Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
107
Issue
3
Pages
630-641
ISSN
0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007070530
Cited by
306
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 6
FWCI
7.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Laboratory Directed Research and Development (12-SI-004)
  • U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (DE-AC52-07NA27344, LLNL-JRNL-648046)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
blood-brain barrier permeability, drug-like molecules, octanol-water partition coefficient, potential of mean force, DOPC bilayer, position-dependent diffusion coefficient, free energy landscape, effective permeability, tight junctions, in silico prediction, neuroactive drugs
MeSH terms
Blood-Brain Barrier, Capillary Permeability, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Models, Biological, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review