Molecular Insights from Conformational Ensembles via Machine Learning
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Biomolecular simulations are intrinsically high dimensional and generate noisy data sets of ever-increasing size. Extracting important features from the data is crucial for understanding the biophysical properties of molecular processes, but remains a big challenge. Machine learning (ML) provides powerful dimensionality reduction tools. However, such methods are often criticized as resembling black boxes with limited human-interpretable insight. We use methods from supervised and unsupervised ML to efficiently create interpretable maps of important features from molecular simulations. We benchmark the performance of several methods, including neural networks, random forests, and principal component analysis, using a toy model with properties reminiscent of macromolecular behavior. We then analyze three diverse biological processes: conformational changes within the soluble protein calmodulin, ligand binding to a G protein-coupled receptor, and activation of an ion channel voltage-sensor domain, unraveling features critical for signal transduction, ligand binding, and voltage sensing. This work demonstrates the usefulness of ML in understanding biomolecular states and demystifying complex simulations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
Crystal structure of the β2 adrenergic receptor–Gs protein complex
Rasmussen, S. G. F., DeVree, B. T., Zou, Y., Kruse, A. C., Chung, K. Y., Kobilka, T. S., Thian, F. S., Chae, P. S., Pardon, E., Calinski, D., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10361 · Cited by 3,009 · see citing works
Explaining nonlinear classification decisions with deep taylor decomposition
Montavon, G., Lapuschkin, S., Binder, A., Samek, W., & Müller, K.-R. (2017) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2016.11.008 · Cited by 1,357 · see citing works
The Molecular Basis of G Protein–Coupled Receptor Activation
Weis, W. I., & Kobilka, B. K. (2018) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033910 · Cited by 1,227 · see citing works
Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics
Chodera, J. D., & Noé, F. (2014) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2014.04.002 · Cited by 776 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Allostery: Allosteric Cancer Drivers and Innovative Allosteric Drugs
Nussinov, R., Zhang, M., Maloney, R., Liu, Y., Tsai, C.-J., & Jang, H. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167569 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fleetwood, O., Kasimova, M. A., Westerlund, A. M., & Delemotte, L.
- Affiliations
- Science for Life Laboratory (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Delemotte, Lucie
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 765-780
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7002924
- OpenAlex
- W2994669396
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Göran Gustafssons Stiftelse för Naturvetenskaplig och Medicinsk Forskning
- Science for Life Laboratory
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Keywords
- conformational ensembles, molecular simulation, dimensionality reduction, model interpretability, calmodulin, G protein-coupled receptors, ligand binding, signal transduction, protein conformational change, feature extraction
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Humans, Protein Conformation, Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review