Automated simulation-based membrane protein refinement into cryo-EM data
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
I. ABSTRACT The resolution revolution has increasingly enabled single-particle cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) reconstructions of previously inaccessible systems, including membrane proteins – a category that constitutes a disproportionate share of drug targets. We present a protocol for using density-guided molecular dynamics simulations to automatically refine atomistic models into membrane-protein cryo-EM maps. Using adaptive-force density-guided simulations as implemented in the GROMACS molecular dynamics package, we show how automated model refinement of a membrane protein is achieved without the need to manually tune the fitting force ad hoc. We also present selection criteria to choose the best fit model which balances stereochemistry and goodness-of-fit. The proposed protocol was used to refine models into a new cryo-EM density of the membrane protein maltoporin, either in a lipid bilayer or detergent micelle, and we found that results do not substantially differ from fitting in solution. Fitted structures satisfied classical model-quality metrics and improved the quality and the model-to-map correlation of the X-ray starting structure. Additionally, the density-guided fitting in combination with generalized orientation-dependent all-atom potential (GOAP) was used to correct the pixel-size estimation of the experimental cryo-EM density map. This work demonstrates the applicability of a straightforward automated approach to fitting membrane-protein cryo-EM densities. Such computational approaches promise to facilitate rapid refinement of proteins under different conditions or with various ligands present, including targets in the highly relevant superfamily of membrane proteins. II. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Cryo-EM is an increasingly critical method of structure determination. As data collection and model generation become more efficient, iteratively fitting an experimental density can still require considerable time and expertise. Membrane proteins are particularly important targets in pharmacology and bioengineering, but can present distinctive challenges to data quality and modeling. Here, we tested a new tool to drive density fitting with molecular dynamics simulations, in context of a new structure of the membrane protein maltoporin. Fitting performed well in detergent, lipids, or solution, offering simpler options for fully automated simulation protocols. We were also able to apply fitting to adjust the microscope’s pixel size. The approach described here should be applicable to rapid, accurate refinement of a variety of membrane-protein structures.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Zhou, H., & Zhou, Y. (2002) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.0217002 · Cited by 902 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Yvonnesdotter, L., Rovšnik, U., Blau, C., Lycksell, M., Howard, R. J., & Lindahl, E.
- Affiliations
- Science for Life Laboratory (SE)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Lindahl, Erik
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-07
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2773-2781
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10397807
- OpenAlex
- W4379470910
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Horizon 2020
- Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
- Vetenskapsrådet (2019-02433, 2021-05806)
- Kempestiftelserna
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- cryo-EM density maps, maltoporin, lipid bilayers, detergent micelles, model selection criteria, GROMACS
- MeSH terms
- Micelles, Protein Conformation, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review