Endometriosis: epidemiology and aetiological factors
Abstract
Estimates of the frequency of endometriosis vary widely. Based on the few reliable data, the prevalence of the condition can reasonably be assumed to be around 10%. Although no consistent information is available on the incidence of the disease, temporal trends suggest an increase among women of reproductive age. This could be explained-at least in part-by changing reproductive habits. Numerous epidemiological studies have indicated that nulliparous women and women reporting short and heavy menstrual cycles are at increased risk of developing endometriosis; data on other risk factors are less consistent. These epidemiological findings strongly support the menstrual reflux hypothesis. Additional evidence in favour of this theory includes the demonstration of viable endometrial cells in the menstrual effluent and peritoneal fluid, experimental implantation and growth of endometrium within the peritoneal cavity, observation of some degree of retrograde menstruation in most women undergoing laparoscopy during menses, and an association between obstructed menstrual outflow and endometriosis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Endometriosis is associated with chronic subclinical inflammation.
“Endometriosis is associated with chronic subclinical inflammation.”
From A high sensitivity assay is more accurate than a classical assay for the measurement of plasma CRP levels in endometriosis (2011) · cites this paper as [5]
Endometriosis causes a significant deterioration in quality of life.
“It causes a significant deterioration in the quality of life [30,31].”
From Endometriosis: Epidemiology, Classification, Pathogenesis, Treatment and Genetics (Review of Literature) (2021) · cites this paper as [31]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 196 · Cited by 718
- Authors
- Viganò, P., Parazzini, F., Somigliana, E., & Vercellini, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Milan (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Vercellini, Paolo
- Venue
- Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-200
- ISSN
- 1521-6934 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167524225
- Cited by
- 718
- References
- 196
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
- Keywords
- endometriosis, prevalence, incidence, risk factors, nulliparity, menstrual cycle length, retrograde menstruation, peritoneal fluid, reproductive behavior
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Contraceptives, Oral, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Life Style, Menstrual Cycle, Middle Aged, Ovarian Diseases, Peritoneal Diseases, Risk Factors, Vaginal Diseases, Genetic Predisposition to Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review