Cited by 718Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsMenstrual Health and Disorders

Endometriosis: epidemiology and aetiological factors

Viganò, Paola, Parazzini, Fabio, Somigliana, Edgardo, Vercellini, Paolo·2004·Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Estimates of the frequency of endometriosis vary widely. Based on the few reliable data, the prevalence of the condition can reasonably be assumed to be around 10%. Although no consistent information is available on the incidence of the disease, temporal trends suggest an increase among women of reproductive age. This could be explained-at least in part-by changing reproductive habits. Numerous epidemiological studies have indicated that nulliparous women and women reporting short and heavy menstrual cycles are at increased risk of developing endometriosis; data on other risk factors are less consistent. These epidemiological findings strongly support the menstrual reflux hypothesis. Additional evidence in favour of this theory includes the demonstration of viable endometrial cells in the menstrual effluent and peritoneal fluid, experimental implantation and growth of endometrium within the peritoneal cavity, observation of some degree of retrograde menstruation in most women undergoing laparoscopy during menses, and an association between obstructed menstrual outflow and endometriosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.01.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 196 · Cited by 718

Authors
Viganò, P., Parazzini, F., Somigliana, E., & Vercellini, P.
Affiliations
University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Vercellini, Paolo
Venue
Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
177-200
ISSN
1521-6934 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167524225
Cited by
718
References
196
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 30
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
Keywords
endometriosis, prevalence, incidence, risk factors, nulliparity, menstrual cycle length, retrograde menstruation, peritoneal fluid, reproductive behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Contraceptives, Oral, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Life Style, Menstrual Cycle, Middle Aged, Ovarian Diseases, Peritoneal Diseases, Risk Factors, Vaginal Diseases, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review