Cited by 210Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesBirth, Development, and HealthGestational Diabetes Research and Management

Aetiology and pathogenesis of IUGR

Sankaran, Srividhya, Kyle, Phillipa M.·2009·Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is a major cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity. A complex and dynamic interaction of maternal, placental and fetal environment is involved in ensuring normal fetal growth. An imbalance or lack of coordination in this complex system may lead to IUGR. Animal studies have given us an insight into some aspects of the basic pathophysiology of IUGR, and recent technologies such as Doppler studies of maternal and fetal vessels have added further information. The aetiologies of IUGR are diverse, involving multiple complex mechanisms, which make understanding of the pathophysiology difficult. However, particular focus is placed on the mechanisms involved in uteroplacental insufficiency as a cause of IUGR, as (1) it is common, (2) outcome can be good if timing of delivery is optimal and (3) it may be amenable to therapy in the future. While the research into the pathophysiology of IUGR continues, there have been interesting discoveries related to the genetic contribution to IUGR and the intrauterine programming of adult-onset diseases attributed to IUGR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.05.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 96 · Cited by 210

Authors
Sankaran, S., & Kyle, P. M.
Affiliations
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Kyle, Phillipa M.
Venue
Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
765-777
ISSN
1521-6934 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965367648
Cited by
210
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 16
FWCI
12.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Keywords
fetal growth restriction, etiology, pathogenesis, placental insufficiency, fetal growth, perinatal mortality, Doppler ultrasound, timing of delivery, genetic contribution, intrauterine programming, adult-onset disease
MeSH terms
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases, Endocrine System Diseases, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Gestational Age, Humans, Kidney Diseases, Lung Diseases, Muscular Diseases, Placenta Diseases, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Placental Circulation, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Prenatal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Fetal Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review