Pelvic floor dysfunction and obesity
Abstract
Obesity is a growing condition within the society and more patients, who have underlying obesity, are presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). The effect of obesity on general health has been well documented, and its impact on the cardiovascular, endocrine, and musculoskeletal systems has been extensively studied. There is now a growing body of evidence on the effects of obesity on the female urogenital system. It seems to influence the prevalence, presentation, assessment, management, and outcome of various types of LUTS and PFD. A holistic approach is needed to assess and manage these patients. A clear understanding of the functions of the pelvic floor and the way it can be affected by obesity is essential in providing holistic care to this group. A frank discussion about patient weight is required in the clinics handling PFD. A multimodal approach to weight loss would help improve PFD symptoms and progression. Patients with obesity should still be offered standard treatment options for all PFDs and should not be forced to lose weight as a prerequisite before starting treatment. However, they should also be made aware of the impediments that being overweight adds to their care and their expectations should be managed accordingly.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Obesity, which is related to morbidity, appears to be mitigated by both prehabilitation and the implementation of evidence informed early recovery after surgery programmes.
“Obesity, which is related to morbidity, appears to be mitigated by both prehabilitation and the implementation of evidence informed early recovery after surgery programmes [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13].”
From How Can We Improve the Assessment and Indifferent Outcomes From Pelvic Organ Prolapse Management From Conservative and Surgical Therapies? ICI‐RS 2025 (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 97 · Cited by 42
- Authors
- Chilaka, C., Toozs-Hobson, P., & Chilaka, V.
- Affiliations
- Birmingham Women's Hospital (GB)
- Hamad Medical Corporation (QA)
- Corresponding author
- Chilaka, Chioma
- Venue
- Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-08
- Volume
- 90
- Pages
- 102389
- ISSN
- 1521-6934 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4383956882
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Keywords
- pelvic floor dysfunction, obesity, lower urinary tract symptoms, weight loss, pelvic floor function, holistic care
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Obesity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Pelvic Floor, Overweight, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Pelvic Floor Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review