Default mode network subsystems are differentially disrupted in posttraumatic stress disorder
Open accessAbstract
Background Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a psychiatric disorder characterized by debilitating re-experiencing, avoidance, and hyperarousal symptoms following trauma exposure. Recent evidence suggests that individuals with PTSD show disrupted functional connectivity in the default mode network, an intrinsic network that consists of a midline core, a medial temporal lobe (MTL) subsystem, and a dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dMPFC) subsystem. The present study examined whether functional connectivity in these subsystems is differentially disrupted in PTSD.Methods Sixty-nine returning war Veterans with PTSD and 44 trauma-exposed Veterans without PTSD underwent resting state functional MRI (rs-fMRI). To examine functional connectivity, seeds were placed in the core hubs of the default mode network, namely the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and anterior medial PFC (aMPFC), and in each subsystem.Results Compared to controls, individuals with PTSD had reduced functional connectivity between the PCC and the hippocampus, a region of the MTL subsystem. Groups did not differ in connectivity between the PCC and dMPFC subsystem or between the aMPFC and any region within either subsystem. In the PTSD group, connectivity between the PCC and hippocampus was negatively associated with avoidance/numbing symptoms. Examination of the MTL and dMPFC subsystems revealed reduced anticorrelation between the ventromedial PFC (vMPFC) seed of the MTL subsystem and the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex in the PTSD group.Conclusions Our results suggest that selective alterations in functional connectivity in the MTL subsystem of the default mode network in PTSD may be an important factor in PTSD pathology and symptomatology.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Structural alterations in PTSD co-occur with functional brain alterations, including alterations in activation and connectivity in the amygdala, hippocampal, orbitofrontal cortex, and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex.
“These structural alterations co-occur with functional brain alterations in PTSD, which include alterations in activation and connectivity in amygdala, hippocampal, orbitofrontal cortex and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex”
From Exercise Intervention in PTSD: A Narrative Review and Rationale for Implementation (2019) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 101
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [27]Koch SB van Zuiden M Nawijn L Frijling JL Veltman DJ Olff M Aberrant resting-state brain activity in posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis and systematic review Depress Anxiety 2016 33 592 605 26918313
- [36]Daniels JK McFarlane AC Bluhm RL Moores KA Clark CR Shaw ME Switching between executive and default mode networks in posttraumatic stress disorder: Alterations in functional connectivity J Psychiatry Neurosci 2010 35 258 266 20569651 PMC2895156
- [65]Williams JM Capture and rumination, functional avoidance, and executive control (CaRFAX): Three processes that underlie overgeneral memory Cogn Emot 2006 20 548 568 26529222
- Authors
- Miller, D. R., Hayes, S. M., Hayes, J. P., Spielberg, J. M., Lafleche, G., & Verfaellie, M.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Miller, Danielle R.
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 363-371
- ISSN
- 2451-9022 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5396184
- OpenAlex
- W2572300605
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 6.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 RX000216)
- National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH084013)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, default mode network, functional connectivity, posterior cingulate cortex, anterior medial prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, avoidance symptoms, war veterans, trauma exposure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review