Cited by 122Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentAction Observation and SynchronizationFace Recognition and Perception

Mentalizing and Marr: An information processing approach to the study of social cognition

Mitchell, Jason P.·2006·Brain Research

Abstract

To interact successfully, individuals must not only recognize one another as intentional agents driven primarily by internal mental states, but also possess a system for making reliable and useful inferences about the nature of those beliefs, feelings, goals, and dispositions. The ability to make such mental state inferences (i.e., to mentalize or mindread) is the central accomplishment of human social cognition. The present article suggests that our understanding of how humans go about making mental state inferences will benefit from treating social cognition primarily as an information processing system that comprises a set of mechanisms for elaborating more basic social information into an understanding of another's mind. Following Marr's [Marr, D., 1982. Vision. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA] framework for the study of such information processing systems, I suggest that questions about social cognition might profitably be asked at three levels--computation, algorithm, and implementation--and outline a number of ways in which a description of social cognition at the middle level (i.e., the step-by-step processes that give rise to mental state inferences) can be informed by analysis at the other two.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.113

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These results are consistent with emerging views that social cognition is best thought of as a consortium of many mental processes, rather than the product of merely one or two.

    “Finally, these results are consistent with emerging views that social cognition is best thought of as a consortium of many mental processes, rather than the product of merely 1 or 2 (Ames 2005;Malle 2005;Mitchell 2006; cf.Leslie et al. 2004).”
  • Mentalizing about similar versus dissimilar others is associated with a distinct division of labor in medial prefrontal cortex: a dorsal aspect for dissimilar others and a more ventral aspect (vMPFC) for similar others.

    “Specifically, a dorsal aspect of the medial prefrontal cortex has been associated with mentalizing about people perceived to be dissimilar from oneself, whereas a more ventral aspect of medial prefrontal cortex (vMPFC) has been linked to mentalizing about those perceived to be similar.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 122

Authors
Mitchell, J. P.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Mitchell, Jason P.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
1079
Issue
1
Pages
66-75
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022993718
Cited by
122
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
mentalization, theory of mind, social cognition, information processing, Marr's levels of description, mental state inference, computational theory of mind, algorithms, implementation, intentional agents
MeSH terms
Electronic Data Processing, Cognition, Humans, Social Behavior, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review