Evaluation of the neuroprotective effect of cannabinoids in a rat model of Parkinson's disease: importance of antioxidant and cannabinoid receptor-independent properties
Abstract
We have recently demonstrated that two plant-derived cannabinoids, Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol (CBD), are neuroprotective in an animal model of Parkinson's disease (PD), presumably because of their antioxidant properties. To further explore this issue, we examined the neuroprotective effects of a series of cannabinoid-based compounds, with more selectivity for different elements of the cannabinoid signalling system, in rats with unilateral lesions of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons caused by local application of 6-hydroxydopamine. We used the CB1 receptor agonist arachidonyl-2-chloroethylamide (ACEA), the CB2 receptor agonist HU-308, the non-selective agonist WIN55,212-2, and the inhibitors of the endocannabinoid inactivation AM404 and UCM707, all of them administered i.p. Daily administration of ACEA or WIN55,212-2 did not reverse 6-hydroxydopamine-induced dopamine (DA) depletion in the lesioned side, whereas HU-308 produced a small recovery that supports a possible involvement of CB2 but not CB1 receptors. AM404 produced a marked recovery of 6-hydroxydopamine-induced DA depletion and tyrosine hydroxylase deficit in the lesioned side. Possibly, this is caused by the antioxidant properties of AM404, which are derived from the presence of a phenolic group in its structure, rather than by the capability of AM404 to block the endocannabinoid transporter, because UCM707, another transporter inhibitor devoid of antioxidant properties, did not produce the same effect. None of these effects were observed in non-lesioned contralateral structures. We also examined the timing for the effect of CBD to provide neuroprotection in this rat model of PD. We found that CBD, as expected, was able to recover 6-hydroxydopamine-induced DA depletion when it was administered immediately after the lesion, but it failed to do that when the treatment started 1 week later. In addition, the effect of CBD implied an upregulation of mRNA levels for Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase, a key enzyme in endogenous defenses against oxidative stress. In summary, our results indicate that those cannabinoids having antioxidant cannabinoid receptor-independent properties provide neuroprotection against the progressive degeneration of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons occurring in PD. In addition, the activation of CB2 (but not CB1) receptors, or other additional mechanisms, might also contribute to some extent to the potential of cannabinoids in this disease.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In animal models of Parkinson's disease, CBD protects neurons by preventing tyrosine hydroxylase activity reduction and dopamine depletion in the substantia nigra.
“In animal models of Parkinson's disease, CBD protects neurons by preventing the tyrosine hydroxylase activity reduction and the dopamine depletion in the substantia nigra (119, 129).”
From Translational investigation of the therapeutic potential of Cannabidiol (CBD): Toward a new age (2018) · cites this paper as [119]
CBD attenuates the depletion of tyrosine hydroxylase, GABA and dopamine levels by modulating the expression of inducible NO synthase and reducing the production of ROS-generating NADPH oxidases.
“and attenuates the depletion of tyrosine hydroxylase, GABA and dopamine levels by modulating the expression of the inducible isoform of NO synthase and reducing the production of ROS-generating NADPH oxidases (114–120).”
From Translational investigation of the therapeutic potential of Cannabidiol (CBD): Toward a new age (2018) · cites this paper as [119]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 320
- Authors
- García-Arencibia, M., González, S., de Lago, E., Ramos, J. A., Mechoulam, R., & Fernández-Ruiz, J.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Venue
- Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 1134
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 162-170
- ISSN
- 0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074551850
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 7.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Biogen
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- Parkinson's disease, neuroprotection, cannabinoids, cannabidiol, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, antioxidant activity, CB1 receptor, CB2 receptor, endocannabinoid system, 6-hydroxydopamine lesion, dopaminergic neuron loss, AM404, WIN 55,212-2, HU-308, ACEA, dopamine depletion, tyrosine hydroxylase, superoxide dismutase, oxidative stress
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antioxidants, Arachidonic Acids, Cannabinoids, Disease Models, Animal, Dopamine, Furans, Male, Morpholines, Naphthalenes, Nerve Degeneration, Organ Culture Techniques, Superoxide Dismutase, Sympatholytics, Oxidopamine, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Oxidative Stress, Neuroprotective Agents, Parkinsonian Disorders, Receptors, Cannabinoid, Benzoxazines, Rats, Polyunsaturated Alkamides, Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists, Cannabinoid Receptor Antagonists
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review