Cited by 121Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

An ERP investigation of the Stroop task: The role of the cingulate in attentional allocation and conflict resolution

Badzakova-Trajkov, Gjurgjica, Barnett, Kylie J., Waldie, Karen E., Kirk, Ian J.·2009·Brain Research

Abstract

The majority of studies support a role of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in the attentional control necessary for conflict resolution in the Stroop task; however, the time course of activation and the neural substrates underlying the Stroop task remain contentious. We used high-density EEG to record visual-evoked potentials from 16 healthy subjects while performing a manual version of the traditional Stroop colour-word task. Difference waveforms for congruent-control and incongruent-control conditions were similar in amplitude and had a similar spatial distribution in the time window of 260-430 ms post stimulus onset. Source estimation indicated particularly middle cingulate involvement in congruent-control and incongruent-control difference waveforms. In contrast, the difference waveform for the incongruent-congruent contrast was observed later (in the time window of 370-480 ms), had a different spatial distribution, and source estimation indicated that the anterior cingulate underlies this difference waveform. As congruent-control and incongruent-control differences have a similar timeframe and cingulate source, we propose that this indicates early attentional allocation processes. That is, the identification of two sources of information (the word and the colour it is printed in) and the selective attention to one. The later peak in the incongruent-congruent difference wave, originating in anterior cingulate, likely reflects identification (and subsequent resolution) of conflict in the two sources of information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.069

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The MCG has been implicated in performance monitoring via conflict detection, reallocation of attentional resources according to task-relevant information, and corresponding action formation.

    “Moreover, the MCG has also been implicated in performance monitoring via conflict detection in information processing, reallocation of attentional resources according to task-relevant information, and corresponding action formation (Badzakova-Trajkov et al. 2009).”

    From Large-scale functional neural network correlates of response inhibition: an fMRI meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as Badzakova-Trajkov et al. 2009

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 121

Authors
Badzakova-Trajkov, G., Barnett, K. J., Waldie, K. E., & Kirk, I. J.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
1253
Pages
139-148
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081826406
Cited by
121
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Auckland
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
Stroop task, anterior cingulate cortex, middle cingulate cortex, conflict resolution, attention allocation, visual evoked potentials, source localization, selective attention
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Brain Mapping, Color, Color Perception, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Reaction Time, Reading, Task Performance and Analysis, Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review