Amphetamine alters behavior and mesocorticolimbic dopamine receptor expression in the monogamous female prairie vole
Open accessAbstract
We have recently established the socially monogamous prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) as an animal model with which to investigate the involvement of mesocorticolimbic dopamine (DA) in the amphetamine (AMPH)-induced impairment of social behavior. As the majority of our work, to date, has focused on males, and sex differences are commonly reported in the behavioral and neurobiological responses to AMPH, the current study was designed to examine the behavioral and neurobiological effects of AMPH treatment in female prairie voles. We used a conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm to determine a dose-response curve for the behavioral effects of AMPH in female prairie voles, and found that conditioning with low to intermediate (0.2 and 1.0 mg/kg), but not very low (0.1 mg/kg), doses of AMPH induced a CPP. We also found that exposure to a behaviorally relevant dose of AMPH (1.0 mg/kg) induced an increase in DA concentration in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) and caudate putamen but not the medial prefrontal cortex or ventral tegmental area (VTA). Finally, repeated AMPH exposure (1.0 mg/kg once per day for 3 consecutive days; an injection paradigm that has been recently shown to alter DA receptor expression and impair social bonding in male prairie voles) increased D1, but not D2, receptor mRNA in the NAcc, and decreased D2 receptor mRNA and D2-like receptor binding in the VTA. Together, these data indicate that AMPH alters mesocorticolimbic DA neurotransmission in a region- and receptor-specific manner, which, in turn, could have profound consequences on social behavior in female prairie voles.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 27
- Authors
- Young, K. A., Liu, Y., Gobrogge, K. L., Dietz, D. M., Wang, H., Kabbaj, M., & Wang, Z.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Zuoxin
- Venue
- Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 1367
- Pages
- 213-222
- ISSN
- 0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3143067
- OpenAlex
- W1978318781
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (DAR01-19627, MHR01-58616, MHF31-79600, DAK02-23048, DAF31-25570)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- amphetamine, Microtus ochrogaster, female social behavior, dopamine receptor expression, dopamine D1 receptor, dopamine D2 receptor, nucleus accumbens, ventral tegmental area, caudate-putamen, conditioned place preference, social bonding, sex differences, social monogamy
- MeSH terms
- Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Conditioning, Operant, Arvicolinae, Dopamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Protein Binding, Receptors, Dopamine, RNA, Messenger
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review