Adolescent exposure to Bisphenol-A increases anxiety and sucrose preference but impairs spatial memory in rats independent of sex
Abstract
The endocrine disruptor Bisphenol-A (BPA) has been shown to modulate estrogenic, androgenic, and anti-androgenic effects. The effects of BPA exposure during early organizational periods of development have been well documented. The current study focuses on the effects of short term, low-dose BPA exposure on anxiety, spatial memory and sucrose preference in adolescent rats. Seven week old Sprague Dawley rats (n=18 male, n=18 female) received daily subcutaneous injections (40 µg/kg body weight) of BPA or vehicle for 12 days. Starting on day 6 of injections, subjects were tested on the elevated plus maze which provides a measure of anxiety, the open field test which provides a measure of anxiety and locomotor activity, and object placement, a measure of spatial memory. On the twelfth day of BPA administration, sucrose preference was tested using a standard two-bottle choice (tap versus sucrose solution). All rats gained weight during the study; there was a main effect of sex, but not BPA treatment on body weight. The results indicate that BPA exposure, regardless of sex, increased anxiety on both the elevated plus maze and open field. Spatial memory was impaired on the object recognition task with BPA animals spending significant less time with the object in the novel location than controls. Finally, a significant increase in sucrose consumption for both male and female subjects exposed to BPA was observed. The current data shows that short term BPA exposure, below the current r…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pre- and perinatal exposures to BPA at or below the TDI (≤50 μg/kg/day) have resulted in adverse effects on memory processes in rodents.
“In rodents, pre- and perinatal exposures to BPA at or below the TDI (tolerable daily intake; ⩽50 μg/kg/day) have resulted in adverse effects on memory processes [4–9].”
From The Rapid Effect of Bisphenol-A on Long-Term Potentiation in Hippocampus Involves Estrogen Receptors and ERK Activation (2017) · cites this paper as [5]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 76 · Cited by 73
- Authors
- Diaz Weinstein, S., Villafane, J. J., Juliano, N., & Bowman, R. E.
- Affiliations
- Sacred Heart University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bowman, Rachel E.
- ORCID
- Bowman, Rachel E.
- Venue
- Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 1529
- Pages
- 56-65
- ISSN
- 0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071870524
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 5.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
- Keywords
- bisphenol A, endocrine disruptors, adolescent exposure, anxiety, spatial memory, sucrose preference, object recognition memory, elevated plus maze, locomotor activity, sex differences, developmental neurotoxicity
- MeSH terms
- Bisphenol A Compounds, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Anxiety, Benzhydryl Compounds, Choice Behavior, Estrogens, Non-Steroidal, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Food Preferences, Male, Memory Disorders, Phenols, Reaction Time, Sex Characteristics, Space Perception, Sucrose, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Maze Learning, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review