Cited by 73Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsEstrogen and related hormone effectsSexual Differentiation and Disorders

Adolescent exposure to Bisphenol-A increases anxiety and sucrose preference but impairs spatial memory in rats independent of sex

Diaz Weinstein, Samantha, Villafane, Joseph J., Juliano, Nicole, Bowman, Rachel E.·2013·Brain Research

Abstract

The endocrine disruptor Bisphenol-A (BPA) has been shown to modulate estrogenic, androgenic, and anti-androgenic effects. The effects of BPA exposure during early organizational periods of development have been well documented. The current study focuses on the effects of short term, low-dose BPA exposure on anxiety, spatial memory and sucrose preference in adolescent rats. Seven week old Sprague Dawley rats (n=18 male, n=18 female) received daily subcutaneous injections (40 µg/kg body weight) of BPA or vehicle for 12 days. Starting on day 6 of injections, subjects were tested on the elevated plus maze which provides a measure of anxiety, the open field test which provides a measure of anxiety and locomotor activity, and object placement, a measure of spatial memory. On the twelfth day of BPA administration, sucrose preference was tested using a standard two-bottle choice (tap versus sucrose solution). All rats gained weight during the study; there was a main effect of sex, but not BPA treatment on body weight. The results indicate that BPA exposure, regardless of sex, increased anxiety on both the elevated plus maze and open field. Spatial memory was impaired on the object recognition task with BPA animals spending significant less time with the object in the novel location than controls. Finally, a significant increase in sucrose consumption for both male and female subjects exposed to BPA was observed. The current data shows that short term BPA exposure, below the current r…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.07.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 76 · Cited by 73

Authors
Diaz Weinstein, S., Villafane, J. J., Juliano, N., & Bowman, R. E.
Affiliations
Sacred Heart University (US)
Corresponding author
Bowman, Rachel E.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
1529
Pages
56-65
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071870524
Cited by
73
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
bisphenol A, endocrine disruptors, adolescent exposure, anxiety, spatial memory, sucrose preference, object recognition memory, elevated plus maze, locomotor activity, sex differences, developmental neurotoxicity
MeSH terms
Bisphenol A Compounds, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Anxiety, Benzhydryl Compounds, Choice Behavior, Estrogens, Non-Steroidal, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Food Preferences, Male, Memory Disorders, Phenols, Reaction Time, Sex Characteristics, Space Perception, Sucrose, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Maze Learning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review