Cited by 19High Altitude and HypoxiaCell death mechanisms and regulationNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Guanfacine promotes neuronal survival in medial prefrontal cortex under hypobaric hypoxia

Kauser, H., Sahu, S., Panjwani, U.·2016·Brain Research

Abstract

High altitude hypobaric hypoxia (HH) affects prefrontal cognitive and executive functions. Guanfacine, alpha 2A adrenoceptor agonist ameliorates the neurological outcomes of high altitude exposure and associated prefrontal neurodegeneration. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the neuroprotective effect of guanfacine following HH remains elusive. Altered balance of pro and anti-apoptotic proteins have been implicated in the beneficial effect of guanfacine to enhance neuronal survival. We examined the effects of guanfacine on expression of some key neurotropic and cytoskeletal proteins following HH. Male rats were exposed to simulated altitude of 7620 m and received an intramuscular injection of either saline or guanfacine at a dose of 1mg/kg for 7 consecutive days. Differential expression of desired proteins was evaluated in layer II of medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) by biochemical and immunohistochemical assays. Guanfacine treatment significantly increased the expression of BDNF in layer II of the medial PFC during normoxia and HH. Moreover, there was a negative correlation of this neurotropic factor with neurodegeneration of pyramidal cells present in this layer of medial PFC. We found a significant decrease in Caspase3 and Bax while a significant increase in Bcl2 with guanfacine treatment during HH. Further, change in Bax to Bcl2 ratio was in correlation with Caspase3 expression in layer II of the medial PFC, indicating that Caspase3 is responsible for Bcl2 cleavag…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.01.053

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 41 · Cited by 19

Authors
Kauser, H., Sahu, S., & Panjwani, U.
Affiliations
Defence Research and Development Organisation (IN)
Corresponding author
Panjwani, U.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
1636
Pages
152-160
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2264707100
Cited by
19
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › High Altitude and Hypoxia
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
guanfacine, hypobaric hypoxia, high altitude, medial prefrontal cortex, neuronal survival, neuroprotection, apoptosis, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, Bax/Bcl-2 ratio, caspase-3, pyramidal neurons, dendritic cytoskeleton, MAP2, spinophilin, dendritic spines
MeSH terms
Altitude Sickness, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Cell Survival, Dendrites, Male, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Neurons, Guanfacine, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Prefrontal Cortex, Neuroprotective Agents, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2, bcl-2-Associated X Protein, Rats, Caspase 3

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review