Cited by 32Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesSleep and Wakefulness Research

Transient disruption of mouse home cage activities and assessment of orexin immunoreactivity following concussive- or blast-induced brain injury

Open access
Vu, Patricia A., Tucker, Laura B., Liu, Jiong, McNamara, Eileen H., Tran, Thanhlong, Fu, Amanda H., Kim, Yeonho, McCabe, Joseph T.·2018·Brain Research

Abstract

The employment of explosive weaponry in modern warfare exposes populations to shock wave-induced and impact-related brain injuries. Among the most common clinical complaints resulting from traumatic brain injury (TBI) are sleep-wake disturbances. The current study assessed the acute effects of mild concussive brain injury (CBI) and mild blast wave-induced brain injury (BTBI) on mouse behavior and orexin-A expression. Male C57BL/6J mice were exposed to CBI, BTBI, or sham procedures. Injured animals and their shams were further divided into the following subgroups: 24-h survival in standard group (SG) housing, 72-h survival in SG housing, and 72-h survival in Any-Maze cages (AMc). AMc enabled continuous monitoring of home cage activities. BTBI caused significant but transient decreases in wheel running and ingestive behaviors 24 h post-injury (PI), while CBI transiently decreased running and water intake. BTBI resulted in general hypoactivity in the open field (OF) at both PI time points for SG-housed animals. In contrast, CBI did not cause hypoactivity. Mice subjected to CBI traveled more in the center of the OF at both time points PI, suggesting that CBI caused reduced anxiety in mice. Increased activity in the center of the OF was also seen at 24 h PI after BTBI. CBI treatment caused increased CD11b immunostaining. However, neither injury was accompanied by an alteration in the number of orexin-A hypothalamic neurons. Taken together, shock wave exposure and concussive injury…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.08.034

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies show no significant differences in orexin neurons between injured and sham-injured animals.

    “Some studies show no significant differences in orexin neurons between injured and sham-injured animals.44,67,69,71,74”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 90 · Cited by 32

Authors
Vu, P. A., Tucker, L. B., Liu, J., McNamara, E. H., Tran, T., Fu, A. H., Kim, Y., & McCabe, J. T.
Affiliations
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
McCabe, Joseph T.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
1700
Pages
138-151
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889496374
Cited by
32
References
90
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine (60855-300600-7.01)
  • Defense Health Agency (64682-307877-2.00)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, concussion, orexin-A, sleep-wake disturbances, wheel running, ingestive behavior, anxiety-like behavior, CD11b, hypothalamic neurons
MeSH terms
Orexins, Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Blast Injuries, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Housing, Animal, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Motor Activity, Neurons, Random Allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review