Transient disruption of mouse home cage activities and assessment of orexin immunoreactivity following concussive- or blast-induced brain injury
Open accessAbstract
The employment of explosive weaponry in modern warfare exposes populations to shock wave-induced and impact-related brain injuries. Among the most common clinical complaints resulting from traumatic brain injury (TBI) are sleep-wake disturbances. The current study assessed the acute effects of mild concussive brain injury (CBI) and mild blast wave-induced brain injury (BTBI) on mouse behavior and orexin-A expression. Male C57BL/6J mice were exposed to CBI, BTBI, or sham procedures. Injured animals and their shams were further divided into the following subgroups: 24-h survival in standard group (SG) housing, 72-h survival in SG housing, and 72-h survival in Any-Maze cages (AMc). AMc enabled continuous monitoring of home cage activities. BTBI caused significant but transient decreases in wheel running and ingestive behaviors 24 h post-injury (PI), while CBI transiently decreased running and water intake. BTBI resulted in general hypoactivity in the open field (OF) at both PI time points for SG-housed animals. In contrast, CBI did not cause hypoactivity. Mice subjected to CBI traveled more in the center of the OF at both time points PI, suggesting that CBI caused reduced anxiety in mice. Increased activity in the center of the OF was also seen at 24 h PI after BTBI. CBI treatment caused increased CD11b immunostaining. However, neither injury was accompanied by an alteration in the number of orexin-A hypothalamic neurons. Taken together, shock wave exposure and concussive injury…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some studies show no significant differences in orexin neurons between injured and sham-injured animals.
“Some studies show no significant differences in orexin neurons between injured and sham-injured animals.44,67,69,71,74”
From Effects of Traumatic Brain Injury on the Orexin/Hypocretin System (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 90 · Cited by 32
- Authors
- Vu, P. A., Tucker, L. B., Liu, J., McNamara, E. H., Tran, T., Fu, A. H., Kim, Y., & McCabe, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
- Corresponding author
- McCabe, Joseph T.
- Venue
- Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 1700
- Pages
- 138-151
- ISSN
- 0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2889496374
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Brain Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine (60855-300600-7.01)
- Defense Health Agency (64682-307877-2.00)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Keywords
- traumatic brain injury, concussion, orexin-A, sleep-wake disturbances, wheel running, ingestive behavior, anxiety-like behavior, CD11b, hypothalamic neurons
- MeSH terms
- Orexins, Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Blast Injuries, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Housing, Animal, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Motor Activity, Neurons, Random Allocation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review