Cited by 17Visual perception and processing mechanismsVestibular and auditory disordersFish biology, ecology, and behavior

Visual orienting response in goldfish: a multidisciplinary study

Torres, B., Luque, M.A., Pérez-Pérez, M.P., Herrero, L.·2005·Brain Research Bulletin

Abstract

The neural basis underlying the orienting response has been thoroughly studied in frontal-eyed mammals. However, in non-mammalian species, including fish, it remains almost unknown. Therefore, we studied the contribution of the optic tectum and the mesencephalic reticular formation to the performance of the orienting response in goldfish, using behavioural, physiological, and anatomical tracer techniques. The appearance of a visual stimulus (a pellet of food) in the environment of a goldfish evoked a turn of the body to reorient the line of sight. Left-tectal lobe ablation abolished the orienting turn response towards the contralateral hemifield. Electrical microstimulation of the optic tectum suggested the presence of a motor map, which is in correspondence with the overlying visual representation, as previously reported in other vertebrates. The tracer biotin-dextran amine was injected into different functionally identified tectal zones. The results showed that rostral and caudal poles of the mesencephalic reticular formation receive outflow mainly from the rostral and caudal tectal poles, respectively. This suggests that the tectal wiring with downstream structures is site-dependent. Furthermore, the electrical activation of rostral and caudal mesencephalic reticular formation revealed a different contribution to vertical and horizontal orienting eye movements. We conclude that the basic neural system coding the orienting response appears early in phylogenesis, although some specific characteristics are selected by adaptive pressure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.02.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spatial-to-temporal code transformations depend on the anatomical organization of the tecto-reticular projections to the separate brainstem generators for horizontal and vertical eye movements.

    “These spatial-to-temporal code transformations are thought to depend on the anatomical organization of the tecto-reticular projections to the separate brainstem generators for horizontal and vertical eye movements [110,111,145,146,147].”

    From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [147]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 17

Authors
Torres, B., Luque, M. A., Pérez-Pérez, M. P., & Herrero, L.
Affiliations
Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Corresponding author
Torres, B.
Venue
Brain Research Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
66
Issue
4-6
Pages
376-380
ISSN
0361-9230 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068394931
Cited by
17
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
Keywords
goldfish, optic tectum, mesencephalic reticular formation, oculomotor control, microstimulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Biotin, Dextrans, Electric Stimulation, Eye Movements, Goldfish, Functional Laterality, Orientation, Photic Stimulation, Reticular Formation, Superior Colliculi, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review