Oxidative stress, protein modification and Alzheimer disease
Abstract
Alzheimer disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects the elderly population with complex etiology. Many hypotheses have been proposed to explain different causes of AD, but the exact mechanisms remain unclear. In this review, we focus attention on the oxidative-stress hypothesis of neurodegeneration and we discuss redox proteomics approaches to analyze post-mortem human brain from AD brain. Collectively, these studies have provided valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms involved both in the pathogenesis and progression of AD, demonstrating the impairment of numerous cellular processes such as energy production, cellular structure, signal transduction, synaptic function, mitochondrial function, cell cycle progression, and degradative systems. Each of these cellular functions normally contributes to maintain healthy neuronal homeostasis, so the deregulation of one or more of these functions could contribute to the pathology and clinical presentation of AD. In particular, we discuss the evidence demonstrating the oxidation/dysfunction of a number of enzymes specifically involved in energy metabolism that support the view that reduced glucose metabolism and loss of ATP are crucial events triggering neurodegeneration and progression of AD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hydroxyl radical reaction with proteins leads to incorporation of carbonyl functionalities and alterations in protein conformation, normally with loss of function.
“The former leads to the incorporation of carbonyl functionalities in proteins and alterations in protein conformation (and normally loss of function as a consequence) [8,22,23,24]”
From Mitochondrial Oxidative and Nitrosative Stress and Alzheimer Disease (2020) · cites this paper as [23]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 90 · Cited by 303
- Authors
- Tramutola, A., Lanzillotta, C., Perluigi, M., & Butterfield, D. A.
- Affiliations
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Corresponding author
- Butterfield, D. Allan
- Venue
- Brain Research Bulletin
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 133
- Pages
- 88-96
- ISSN
- 0361-9230 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2440371497
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Research Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fondi di Ateneo Sapienza
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, oxidative stress, oxidative stress hypothesis, redox proteomics, protein oxidation, neurodegeneration, postmortem brain, mitochondrial dysfunction, energy metabolism, glucose metabolism, ATP depletion, synaptic function, signal transduction, cell cycle
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Glucose, Humans, Mitochondria, Oxidation-Reduction, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Reactive Oxygen Species, Oxidative Stress, Disease Progression, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Mitochondrial Proton-Translocating ATPases, Proteomics, Proteolysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review