Cited by 27Memory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory Processes and Influences

Molecular and synaptic mechanisms regulating drug-associated memories: towards a bidirectional treatment strategy

Rich, Matthew T., Torregrossa, Mary M.·2018·Brain Research Bulletin

Abstract

The successful treatment of substance use disorders is dependent on the establishment of a long-term abstinent state. Relapse can be suppressed by interfering with memories of drug use that are evoked by re-exposure to drug-associated contexts and cues. Two strategies for accomplishing this goal are either to prevent drug-memory reconsolidation or to induce the formation of a competing, extinction memory. However, clinical attempts to prolong abstinence by behavioral modification of drug-related memories have had limited success. One approach to improve behavioral treatment strategies is to identify the molecular mechanisms that regulate these memory processes and then use pharmacological tools as supplements to improve efficacy. Still, due to the involvement of several overlapping signaling cascades in both reconsolidation and extinction, it is difficult to specifically modify one of the two processes. For example, attempting to elicit extinction may instead initiate reconsolidation, resulting in the unintentional strengthening of drug-related memories. A better approach is to identify diverging components of the two processes, whereby a single medication would simultaneously weaken reconsolidation and enhance extinction. This review will provide an overview of the neural substrates that are involved in the regulation of drug-associated memories, and will discuss emerging approaches to pharmacologically weaken these memories, including recent efforts to precisely and bidirectionally target reconsolidation and extinction. Ultimately, pharmacologically-enhanced memory-based approaches have the potential to produce more informed relapse-prevention therapies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2017.09.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 238 · Cited by 27

Authors
Rich, M. T., & Torregrossa, M. M.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Rich, Matthew T.
Venue
Brain Research Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
141
Pages
58-71
ISSN
0361-9230 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2755098168
Cited by
27
References
238
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (F31DA039646, K01DA031745, R01DA042029, T32DA031111)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
drug-associated memory, memory reconsolidation, memory extinction, substance use disorders, relapse prevention, synaptic mechanisms, neural substrates of memory, drug cues
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Learning, Synapses, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review