Learned helplessness: Validity and reliability of depressive-like states in mice
Abstract
The learned helplessness paradigm is a depression model in which animals are exposed to unpredictable and uncontrollable stress, e.g. electroshocks, and subsequently develop coping deficits for aversive but escapable situations (J.B. Overmier, M.E. Seligman, Effects of inescapable shock upon subsequent escape and avoidance responding, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 63 (1967) 28-33 ). It represents a model with good similarity to the symptoms of depression, construct, and predictive validity in rats. Despite an increased need to investigate emotional, in particular depression-like behaviors in transgenic mice, so far only a few studies have been published using the learned helplessness paradigm. One reason may be the fact that-in contrast to rats (B. Vollmayr, F.A. Henn, Learned helplessness in the rat: improvements in validity and reliability, Brain Res. Brain Res. Protoc. 8 (2001) 1-7)--there is no generally accepted learned helplessness protocol available for mice. This prompted us to develop a reliable helplessness procedure in C57BL/6N mice, to exclude possible artifacts, and to establish a protocol, which yields a consistent fraction of helpless mice following the shock exposure. Furthermore, we validated this protocol pharmacologically using the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine. Here, we present a mouse model with good face and predictive validity that can be used for transgenic, behavioral, and pharmacological studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The learned helplessness paradigm models depression-like behavior in rodents.
“is modeled in rodents with the learned helplessness paradigm of depression-like behavior (39)”
From Inflammatory T helper 17 cells promote depression-like behavior in mice (2013) · cites this paper as [39]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 216
- Authors
- Chourbaji, S., Zacher, C., Sanchis-Segura, C., Dormann, C., Vollmayr, B., & Gass, P.
- Affiliations
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Chourbaji, S.
- ORCID
- Zacher, C.
- Venue
- Brain Research Protocols
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 70-78
- ISSN
- 1385-299X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998586143
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Research Protocols (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- learned helplessness, depression-like behavior, mouse model of depression, inescapable shock, unpredictable stress, protocol validation, face validity, predictive validity, imipramine, antidepressant effects, C57BL/6N mice
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antidepressive Agents, Avoidance Learning, Depressive Disorder, Electroshock, Helplessness, Learned, Imipramine, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Pain Measurement, Reaction Time, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review