Cited by 216Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorStress Responses and CortisolTreatment of Major Depression

Learned helplessness: Validity and reliability of depressive-like states in mice

Chourbaji, S., Zacher, C., Sanchis-Segura, C., Dormann, C., Vollmayr, B., Gass, P.·2005·Brain Research Protocols

Abstract

The learned helplessness paradigm is a depression model in which animals are exposed to unpredictable and uncontrollable stress, e.g. electroshocks, and subsequently develop coping deficits for aversive but escapable situations (J.B. Overmier, M.E. Seligman, Effects of inescapable shock upon subsequent escape and avoidance responding, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 63 (1967) 28-33 ). It represents a model with good similarity to the symptoms of depression, construct, and predictive validity in rats. Despite an increased need to investigate emotional, in particular depression-like behaviors in transgenic mice, so far only a few studies have been published using the learned helplessness paradigm. One reason may be the fact that-in contrast to rats (B. Vollmayr, F.A. Henn, Learned helplessness in the rat: improvements in validity and reliability, Brain Res. Brain Res. Protoc. 8 (2001) 1-7)--there is no generally accepted learned helplessness protocol available for mice. This prompted us to develop a reliable helplessness procedure in C57BL/6N mice, to exclude possible artifacts, and to establish a protocol, which yields a consistent fraction of helpless mice following the shock exposure. Furthermore, we validated this protocol pharmacologically using the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine. Here, we present a mouse model with good face and predictive validity that can be used for transgenic, behavioral, and pharmacological studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainresprot.2005.09.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 216

Authors
Chourbaji, S., Zacher, C., Sanchis-Segura, C., Dormann, C., Vollmayr, B., & Gass, P.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Chourbaji, S.
Venue
Brain Research Protocols
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-12
Volume
16
Issue
1-3
Pages
70-78
ISSN
1385-299X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998586143
Cited by
216
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
learned helplessness, depression-like behavior, mouse model of depression, inescapable shock, unpredictable stress, protocol validation, face validity, predictive validity, imipramine, antidepressant effects, C57BL/6N mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Antidepressive Agents, Avoidance Learning, Depressive Disorder, Electroshock, Helplessness, Learned, Imipramine, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Pain Measurement, Reaction Time, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review