Unraveling the attentional functions of cortical cholinergic inputs: interactions between signal-driven and cognitive modulation of signal detection
Abstract
Neurophysiological studies demonstrated that increases in cholinergic transmission in sensory areas enhance the cortical processing of thalamic inputs. Cholinergic activity also suppresses the retrieval of internal associations, thereby further promoting sensory input processing. Behavioral studies documented the role of cortical cholinergic inputs in attentional functions and capacities by demonstrating, for example, that the integrity of the cortical cholinergic input system is necessary for attentional performance, and that the activity of cortical cholinergic inputs is selectively enhanced during attentional performance. This review aims at integrating the neurophysiological and behavioral evidence on the functions of cortical cholinergic inputs and hypothesizes that the cortical cholinergic input system generally acts to optimize the processing of signals in attention-demanding contexts. Such signals 'recruit', via activation of basal forebrain corticopetal cholinergic projections, the cortical attention systems and thereby amplify the processing of attention-demanding signals (termed 'signal-driven cholinergic modulation of detection'). The activity of corticopetal cholinergic projections is also modulated by direct prefrontal projections to the basal forebrain and, indirectly, to cholinergic terminals elsewhere in the cortex; thus, cortical cholinergic inputs are also involved in the mediation of top-down effects, such as the knowledge-based augmentation of detection (see Footnote 1) of signals and the filtering of irrelevant information (termed 'cognitive cholinergic modulation of detection'). Thus, depending on the quality of signals and task characteristics, cortical cholinergic activity reflects the combined effects of signal-driven and cognitive modulation of detection. This hypothesis begins to explain signal intensity or duration-dependent performance in attention tasks, the distinct effects of cortex-wide versus prefrontal cholinergic deafferentation on attention performance, and it generates specific predictions concerning cortical acetylcholine (ACh) release in attention task-performing animals. Finally, the consequences of abnormalities in the regulation of cortical cholinergic inputs for the manifestation of the symptoms of major neuropsychiatric disorders are conceptualized in terms of dysregulation in the signal-driven and cognitive cholinergic modulation of detection processes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cholinergic and noradrenergic projections to the medial temporal lobe can also modulate LTP and long-term memory.
“LCholinergic [136] and noradrenergic [10] projections to MTL can also modulate LTP and long-term memory.”
From A neoHebbian framework for episodic memory; role of dopamine-dependent late LTP (2011) · cites this paper as [136]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 195 · Cited by 667
- Authors
- Sarter, M., Hasselmo, M. E., Bruno, J. P., & Givens, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Boston University (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sarter, Martin
- Venue
- Brain Research Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 98-111
- ISSN
- 0165-0173 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158024903
- Cited by
- 667
- References
- 195
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 2.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH060450, MH 60013, R01MH063114, R01MH057436, MH-60450, MH 057436, MH01072, MH61492, MH 063114, R01MH061492, K02MH001072)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 16454, R01DA016454)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS37026, R01NS037026)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Keywords
- acetylcholine, attention, signal detection, top-down modulation, neuropsychiatric disorders, basal forebrain
- MeSH terms
- Acetylcholine, Afferent Pathways, Animals, Attention, Cerebral Cortex, Cholinergic Fibers, Cognition, Humans, Models, Neurological, Signal Detection, Psychological, Basal Nucleus of Meynert
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review