Cited by 667Neural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Unraveling the attentional functions of cortical cholinergic inputs: interactions between signal-driven and cognitive modulation of signal detection

Sarter, Martin, Hasselmo, Michael E., Bruno, John P., Givens, Ben·2005·Brain Research Reviews

Abstract

Neurophysiological studies demonstrated that increases in cholinergic transmission in sensory areas enhance the cortical processing of thalamic inputs. Cholinergic activity also suppresses the retrieval of internal associations, thereby further promoting sensory input processing. Behavioral studies documented the role of cortical cholinergic inputs in attentional functions and capacities by demonstrating, for example, that the integrity of the cortical cholinergic input system is necessary for attentional performance, and that the activity of cortical cholinergic inputs is selectively enhanced during attentional performance. This review aims at integrating the neurophysiological and behavioral evidence on the functions of cortical cholinergic inputs and hypothesizes that the cortical cholinergic input system generally acts to optimize the processing of signals in attention-demanding contexts. Such signals 'recruit', via activation of basal forebrain corticopetal cholinergic projections, the cortical attention systems and thereby amplify the processing of attention-demanding signals (termed 'signal-driven cholinergic modulation of detection'). The activity of corticopetal cholinergic projections is also modulated by direct prefrontal projections to the basal forebrain and, indirectly, to cholinergic terminals elsewhere in the cortex; thus, cortical cholinergic inputs are also involved in the mediation of top-down effects, such as the knowledge-based augmentation of detection (see Footnote 1) of signals and the filtering of irrelevant information (termed 'cognitive cholinergic modulation of detection'). Thus, depending on the quality of signals and task characteristics, cortical cholinergic activity reflects the combined effects of signal-driven and cognitive modulation of detection. This hypothesis begins to explain signal intensity or duration-dependent performance in attention tasks, the distinct effects of cortex-wide versus prefrontal cholinergic deafferentation on attention performance, and it generates specific predictions concerning cortical acetylcholine (ACh) release in attention task-performing animals. Finally, the consequences of abnormalities in the regulation of cortical cholinergic inputs for the manifestation of the symptoms of major neuropsychiatric disorders are conceptualized in terms of dysregulation in the signal-driven and cognitive cholinergic modulation of detection processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.08.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 195 · Cited by 667

Authors
Sarter, M., Hasselmo, M. E., Bruno, J. P., & Givens, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Sarter, Martin
Venue
Brain Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-02
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
98-111
ISSN
0165-0173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158024903
Cited by
667
References
195
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 42
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH060450, MH 60013, R01MH063114, R01MH057436, MH-60450, MH 057436, MH01072, MH61492, MH 063114, R01MH061492, K02MH001072)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 16454, R01DA016454)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS37026, R01NS037026)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
acetylcholine, attention, signal detection, top-down modulation, neuropsychiatric disorders, basal forebrain
MeSH terms
Acetylcholine, Afferent Pathways, Animals, Attention, Cerebral Cortex, Cholinergic Fibers, Cognition, Humans, Models, Neurological, Signal Detection, Psychological, Basal Nucleus of Meynert

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review