Cited by 140Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Responsibility and obsessive–compulsive disorder: An experimental test

Arntz, Arnoud, Voncken, Marisol, Goosen, Ank C.A.·2007·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

To test the causal status of responsibility in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), an experiment was executed in which responsibility was experimentally manipulated. OCD patients, non-OCD anxiety controls, and non-patients executed a classification task in either a high or a low responsibility (LoRes) condition. Subjective ratings related to danger and responsibility indicated that the manipulation was successful. Subjective OCD-like experiences and checking behaviors were higher in OCD patients in the high responsibility (HiRes) condition than in all other groups. Although the checking subscale of the Padua Inventory correlated with subjective ratings in the OCD patients in the HiRes condition, it was not associated with checking behaviors. The results confirm the hypothesis that responsibility plays a causal role in OCD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2006.03.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The role of proneness to inflated responsibility and fear of guilt in the development and maintenance of OCD has been well documented.

    “Indeed, the role of proneness to inflated responsibility and fear of guilt in the development and maintenance of OCD has been well documented (Arntz et al., 2007; Ladouceur et al., 1995; Mancini et al., 2004; Mancini & Gangemi, 2004; Melli et al., 2017; Rachman, 1993; Salkovskis, 1985; Shafran et al., 1996; Shapiro & Stewart, 2011; Steketee et al., 1991).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 140

Authors
Arntz, A., Voncken, M., & Goosen, A. C. A.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Arntz, Arnoud
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
425-435
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981733401
Cited by
140
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, responsibility, checking behavior, danger perception, anxiety, Padua Inventory, classification tasks
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety Disorders, Dangerous Behavior, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Guilt, Humans, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Phobic Disorders, Psychological Theory, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Social Responsibility, Case-Control Studies, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review