Responsibility and obsessive–compulsive disorder: An experimental test
Abstract
To test the causal status of responsibility in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), an experiment was executed in which responsibility was experimentally manipulated. OCD patients, non-OCD anxiety controls, and non-patients executed a classification task in either a high or a low responsibility (LoRes) condition. Subjective ratings related to danger and responsibility indicated that the manipulation was successful. Subjective OCD-like experiences and checking behaviors were higher in OCD patients in the high responsibility (HiRes) condition than in all other groups. Although the checking subscale of the Padua Inventory correlated with subjective ratings in the OCD patients in the HiRes condition, it was not associated with checking behaviors. The results confirm the hypothesis that responsibility plays a causal role in OCD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The role of proneness to inflated responsibility and fear of guilt in the development and maintenance of OCD has been well documented.
“Indeed, the role of proneness to inflated responsibility and fear of guilt in the development and maintenance of OCD has been well documented (Arntz et al., 2007; Ladouceur et al., 1995; Mancini et al., 2004; Mancini & Gangemi, 2004; Melli et al., 2017; Rachman, 1993; Salkovskis, 1985; Shafran et al., 1996; Shapiro & Stewart, 2011; Steketee et al., 1991).”
From TREATING GUILT-INDUCING SELF-TALK IN OCD WITH DRAMATIZED SOCRATIC DIALOGUE: A STEP BY STEP INTERVENTION (2024) · cites this paper as Arntz et al., 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 140
- Authors
- Arntz, A., Voncken, M., & Goosen, A. C. A.
- Affiliations
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Arntz, Arnoud
- Venue
- Behaviour Research and Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 425-435
- ISSN
- 0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981733401
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- obsessive-compulsive disorder, responsibility, checking behavior, danger perception, anxiety, Padua Inventory, classification tasks
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety Disorders, Dangerous Behavior, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Guilt, Humans, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Phobic Disorders, Psychological Theory, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Social Responsibility, Case-Control Studies, Principal Component Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review