Social anxiety and self-protective communication style in close relationships
Abstract
People with higher social anxiety tend to reveal less information about themselves in interactions with strangers, and this appears to be part of a self-protective strategy adopted in situations in which the risk of negative evaluation is judged to be particularly high. This research examined whether a similar style of communication may be adopted by people with higher social anxiety in their close relationships, and whether it may be associated with decrements in the quality (support, depth, conflict) of these relationships. Over 300 people from the community completed a series of online questionnaires measuring social anxiety and depression, and disclosure in and quality of their close friendships and romantic relationships. After controlling for levels of depression, social anxiety was associated with a paucity of disclosure in both romantic relationships and close friendships in females, but not males. There was an indirect association between higher social anxiety and lower relationship quality (lower support, with a trend towards greater conflict) via lower self-disclosure in women's romantic relationships, but not their close friendships. Addressing disclosure in the context of close relationships may assist socially anxious women to develop more fulfilling and harmonious close relationships.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social anxiety is a risk factor for a wide range of negative consequences in different aspects of social interaction.
“Social anxiety is a risk factor for a wide range of negative consequences in different aspects of social interaction (Cuming & Rapee, 2010;La Greca & Lopez, 1998;Larkins, 2014).”
From Social anxiety mediates the effect of attachment to parents on friendships and loneliness during the college transition (2023) · cites this paper as Cuming & Rapee, 2010
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 83 · Cited by 130
- Authors
- Cuming, S., & Rapee, R. M.
- Affiliations
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Cuming, Samantha
- Venue
- Behaviour Research and Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 87-96
- ISSN
- 0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066817389
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
- Keywords
- social anxiety, self-disclosure, close relationships, relationship quality, romantic relationships, friendship, relationship support, relationship conflict, gender differences, depression
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Communication, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Disclosure, Sex Characteristics, Social Behavior, Internet, Friends, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review