Cited by 130Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesAttachment and Relationship DynamicsCommunication in Education and Healthcare

Social anxiety and self-protective communication style in close relationships

Cuming, Samantha, Rapee, Ronald M.·2010·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

People with higher social anxiety tend to reveal less information about themselves in interactions with strangers, and this appears to be part of a self-protective strategy adopted in situations in which the risk of negative evaluation is judged to be particularly high. This research examined whether a similar style of communication may be adopted by people with higher social anxiety in their close relationships, and whether it may be associated with decrements in the quality (support, depth, conflict) of these relationships. Over 300 people from the community completed a series of online questionnaires measuring social anxiety and depression, and disclosure in and quality of their close friendships and romantic relationships. After controlling for levels of depression, social anxiety was associated with a paucity of disclosure in both romantic relationships and close friendships in females, but not males. There was an indirect association between higher social anxiety and lower relationship quality (lower support, with a trend towards greater conflict) via lower self-disclosure in women's romantic relationships, but not their close friendships. Addressing disclosure in the context of close relationships may assist socially anxious women to develop more fulfilling and harmonious close relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2009.09.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 83 · Cited by 130

Authors
Cuming, S., & Rapee, R. M.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Cuming, Samantha
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
87-96
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066817389
Cited by
130
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
Keywords
social anxiety, self-disclosure, close relationships, relationship quality, romantic relationships, friendship, relationship support, relationship conflict, gender differences, depression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Communication, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Disclosure, Sex Characteristics, Social Behavior, Internet, Friends, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review